Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26283
Title: Physiotherapists’ opinions of the physiotherapy assessment of Breathing Pattern Dysfunction: a qualitative study
Authors: Grillo, L
Lewis, A
Shannon, H
Russell, AM
Issue Date: 11-Nov-2022
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group on behalf of British Thoracic Society
Citation: Grillo, L. et al. (2022) 'Physiotherapists’ opinions of the physiotherapy assessment of Breathing Pattern Dysfunction: a qualitative study', Thorax, 77 (Suppl. 1), pp. A13 - A13. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-BTSabstracts.20.
Abstract: Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Introduction: Breathing Pattern Dysfunction (BPD) describes individuals whose breathing pattern is not aligned with their respiratory or metabolic requirements, resulting in breathlessness, air hunger and reduced quality of life.1 Physiotherapy assessment is essential to ensure that patients can access effective therapy. Currently, there are no best practice guidelines to inform physiotherapists of the essential components for BPD assessments.2 Objectives: Evaluate clinicians’ preferred descriptors for BPD Describe the components frequently included in a patient assessment Explore physiotherapists’ understanding of the assessment of BPD Methods: A 24-item survey was developed and distributed via social media and emailed to UK specialist physiotherapy interest groups. Two semi-structured focus groups, including open-ended discussion points, were subsequently completed with 15 specialist physiotherapists. Survey information was collated as percentages and focus groups transcribed verbatim before a thematic analysis was completed. Results: 103 physiotherapists completed the survey, which identified a lack of consensus in how to define BPD, but some agreement on the components to include in assessment (figure 1). Three main themes resulted from the focus groups. Participants expressed frustration with inconsistency of terms used to describe the condition (1. Nomenclature and Language) and felt that BPD sat within the broader concept of breathlessness as an important component of breathlessness assessment (2. BPD and Breathlessness). The importance of physiotherapy assessment was discussed as being an important part of the therapy and recovery itself (3. Value of assessment). Assessment of BPD was discussed as a specialist skill, and important in patients’ validation of their symptoms. However, there was lack of agreement of the assessment methods and importance of diaphragm assessment. Table 1 Survey results for the preferred term to describe this condition Term Percentage % Breathing Pattern Disorder 43% Dysfunctional Breathing 39% Breathing Pattern Dysfunction 14% Hyperventilation 4% Conclusion: This novel qualitative clinician-focused investigation of BPD assessment provides valuable insights into physiotherapists’ assessment preferences and will be important when designing clinical practice guidance for BPD Assessment. Patient perceptions will provide a deeper understanding of BPD and its assessment. References Vidotto LS, Carvalho CRF de, Harvey A, Jones M. Dysfunctional breathing: what do we know? Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 2019;45(1). Todd S, Walsted ES, Grillo L et al. Novel assessment tool to detect BPD in patients with refractory asthma. Respirology 2018;23(3).
Description: Presented at: British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting 2022, QEII Centre, Broad Sanctuary, Westminster, London SW1P 3EE. Part of the stream: ‘Chariots of fire’ – Interventions and assessment in respiratory physiotherapy.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26283
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-BTSabstracts.20
ISSN: 0040-6376
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Adam Lewis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8823
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-BTSabstracts.20 This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Made available on this repository under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).80.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons