Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26475
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, EJM-
dc.contributor.authorBroadbent, DP-
dc.contributor.authorKinrade, NP-
dc.contributor.authorCoughlan, EK-
dc.contributor.authorBishop, DT-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T09:34:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-19T09:34:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-08-
dc.identifierORCiD: David P. Broadbent https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-6522-
dc.identifierORCiD: Noel P. Kinrade https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-4628-
dc.identifierORCiD: Daniel T. Bishop https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-8559-
dc.identifier1142508-
dc.identifier.citationMcLoughlin, E.J.M. et al. (2023) 'Factors affecting decision-making in Gaelic Football: a focus group approach', Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1142508, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142508.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26475-
dc.descriptionSupplementary material: The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142508/full#supplementary-material .-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Research examining decision-making in sports has predominantly used experimental approaches that fail to provide a holistic understanding of the various factors that impact the decision-making process. The current study aimed to explore the decision-making processes of Senior (expert) and Academy (near-expert) Gaelic Football players using a focus group approach. Methods: Four focus groups were conducted; two with Senior players (n = 5; n = 6) and two with U17 Academy players (n = 5; n = 6). In each focus group, short video clips of Senior Gaelic football games were played, and the action was paused at key moments. The group then discussed the options available to the player in possession, the decision they would make in that situation, and importantly, what factors influenced the final decision. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes that emerged from the focus groups. Results and discussion: Four primary themes emerged that affected the decision-making process. Three themes were related to information sources, namely, pre-match context (coach tactics and instructions, match importance, and opposition status), current match context (score and time remaining), and visual information (player positioning and field space, and visual search strategy), and the fourth theme related to individual differences (self-efficacy, risk propensity, perceived pressure, physical characteristics, action capabilities, fatigue) that moderated the decision-making process. Compared to the near-expert Academy players, the expert Senior players displayed a more sophisticated understanding of the various sources of information and were able to integrate them in a more complex manner to make projections regarding future scenarios. For both groups, the decision-making process was moderated by individual differences. A schematic has been developed based on the study findings in an attempt to illustrate the hypothesized decision-making process.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 15-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 McLoughlin, Broadbent, Kinrade, Coughlan and Bishop. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectexpertiseen_US
dc.subjectanticipationen_US
dc.subjectperceptual-cognitive skillsen_US
dc.subjectsituation awarenessen_US
dc.subjectoption generationen_US
dc.titleFactors affecting decision-making in Gaelic Football: a focus group approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142508-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Psychology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderMcLoughlin, Broadbent, Kinrade, Coughlan and Bishop-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 McLoughlin, Broadbent, Kinrade, Coughlan and Bishop. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.510.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons