Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26936
Title: Internationalization and digitalization: Their differing role on grocer and non-grocer retailer performance
Authors: Batsakis, G
Theoharakis, V
Li, C
Konara, P
Keywords: internationalization and performance (I–P);digital channels;grocery vs non-grocery retailers;e-commerce;digitalization
Issue Date: 10-Aug-2023
Publisher: Elsevier on behalf of New York University
Citation: Batsakis, G. et al. (2023) 'Internationalization and digitalization: Their differing role on grocer and non-grocer retailer performance', Journal of Retailing, 99 (3), pp. 400 - 419. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2023.07.005.
Abstract: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). This study investigates the interplay between two critical phenomena in retailing, i.e., internationalization and digitalization, while accounting for retail sector differences. On one hand, internationalization allows retailers to access a wider range of markets, and on the other, digital channel expansion enhances customer reach and convenience within international markets. More specifically, we examine the relationship between retailer internationalization and performance (I-P relationship), and how this relationship is contingent upon the idiosyncrasies of retail sectors (i.e., grocery vs. non-grocery), digitalization, and their combined effects. Building on the liability of foreignness perspective, we first argue that the I-P relationship is U-shaped, because internationalizing retailers initially incur greater costs in their international expansion owing to their unfamiliarity with foreign markets, but as their foreign presence increases, they benefit from greater market power, experience, and scale economies. Then, we contend that as grocers suffer from higher levels of liability of foreignness due to increased requirements for host country embeddedness, non-grocers benefit more from internationalization with any gains and losses further amplified by digitalization. Hypotheses are tested against a panel of the 234 largest international retailers in the world over a 21-year period (1997–2017) and findings support the conjectures.
Description: Executive summary: The question of whether and to what extent retailers should enter foreign markets has always been of critical importance in their corporate strategic decision-making. This is due to the costs and benefits a retailer has to consider when internationalizing. Our study shows that retailers incur more costs and enjoy less benefits in the early stages of their international activity. This is mainly due to their liability of foreignness that is associated with foreign market unfamiliarity (unfamiliarity hazards), lack of networks in the host country (relational hazards), and unfavorable treatment by local stakeholders (discrimination hazards). Yet, at later stages and once retailers have extended their retail presence abroad, the benefits of enjoying greater market power and scale economies surpass any costs. In addition, we show that while non-grocery retailers suffer from comparatively more losses initially, they later enjoy greater gains from internationalization versus grocers who continuously encounter host country embeddedness requirements. While we in general also find that digitalization can be more costly for retailers at early stages of internationalization, it can lead to considerable performance benefits at later stages; this effect is stronger for non-grocery retailers.
Supplementary materials are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435923000337#sec0030 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26936
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2023.07.005
ISSN: 0022-4359
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Georgios Batsakis https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-5001
ORCID iD: Vasilis Theoharakis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-4239
ORCID iD: Chengguang Li https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-2382
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullTextM.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of New York University. This is an open access article under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).997.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons