Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26960
Title: A systematic review and meta-analytic synthesis of the relationship between compulsory citizenship behaviors and its theoretical correlates
Authors: Yildiz, B
Kaptan, Z
Yildiz, T
Elibol, E
Yildiz, H
Ozbilgin, M
Keywords: compulsory citizenship behaviors;employees;meta-analysis;systematic review;CCBs
Issue Date: 4-May-2023
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Citation: Yildiz, B. et al. (2023) 'A systematic review and meta-analytic synthesis of the relationship between compulsory citizenship behaviors and its theoretical correlates', Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14,1120209, pp. 1 - 21. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120209.
Abstract: Background: Compulsory citizenship behaviors (CCBs) are increasingly endorsed and expected of workers in contexts where managerial worker protections are low and performance demands on workers are high. Although studies on compulsory citizenship behaviors have shown a significant increase in recent years, the literature still lacks a comprehensive meta-analysis. To fill this gap the purpose of this study is to synthesize the collective outcomes of prior quantitative research on CCBs with the objective of identifying the factors linked to the concept and offering a primary reference for future researchers. Methods: Forty-three different correlates with CCBs were synthesized. The dataset of this meta-analysis consists of 53 independent samples with a sample size of 17.491, contributing to 180 effect sizes. PRISMA flow diagram and PICOS framework were used for the study design. Result: Results showed only gender and age were significant among demographic characteristics related to CCBs. Correlates between CCBs and counterproductive workplace behaviors, felt obligation, work-family conflict, organizational-based self-esteem, organizational cynicism, burnout, anger toward the organization, and work alienation were found as large. We also found turnover intention, moral disengagement, careerism, abusive supervision, citizenship pressure, job stress, facades of conformity, and feeling trusted to be moderately related to CCBs. Next, there was a small relationship between CCBs and social loafing. On the other hand, LMX, psychological safety, organizational identification, organizational justice, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job autonomy were found as significant deterrents of CCBs. These results suggest that CCBs flourish in contexts with low levels of worker protection and low road practices to people management. Conclusion: In sum, we found solid cumulative evidence that CCBs are a harmful and undesirable phenomenon for employees and organizations. Also, positive correlations of felt obligation, feeling trusted, and organization-based self-esteem with CCBs, showed that, contrary to general acceptance, positive factors could also cause CCBs. Lastly, we found CCBs as a dominant phenomenon in eastern culture.
Description: Data availability statement: The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Supplementary material: The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120209/full#supplementary-material
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26960
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120209
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Mustafa F Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534
1120209
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 Yildiz, Kaptan, Yildiz, Elibol, Yildiz and Ozbilgin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.2.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons