Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27460
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiabani, N-
dc.contributor.authorBirdseye, A-
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, S-
dc.contributor.authorDelogu, A-
dc.contributor.authorRosenzweig, J-
dc.contributor.authorCvetkovic, Z-
dc.contributor.authorNesbitt, A-
dc.contributor.authorDrakatos, P-
dc.contributor.authorSteier, J-
dc.contributor.authorKumari, V-
dc.contributor.authorO’Regan, D-
dc.contributor.authorRosenzweig, I-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-28T10:49:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-28T10:49:14Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-14-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Veena Kumari https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-5505-
dc.identifier.citationBiabani, N. et al. (2023) 'The neurophysiologic landscape of the sleep onset: a systematic review', Journal of Thoracic Disease, 15 (8), pp. 4530 - 4543. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-325.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-1439-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27460-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The sleep onset process is an ill-defined complex process of transition from wakefulness to sleep, characterized by progressive modifications at the subjective, behavioural, cognitive, and physiological levels. To this date, there is no international consensus which could aid a principled characterisation of this process for clinical research purposes. The current review aims to systemise the current knowledge about the underlying mechanisms of the natural heterogeneity of this process. Methods: In this systematic review, studies investigating the process of the sleep onset from 1970 to 2022 were identified using electronic database searches of PsychINFO, MEDLINE, and Embase. Results: A total of 139 studies were included; 110 studies in healthy participants and 29 studies in participants with sleep disorders. Overall, there is a limited consensus across a body of research about what distinct biomarkers of the sleep onset constitute. Only sparse data exists on the physiology, neurophysiology and behavioural mechanisms of the sleep onset, with majority of studies concentrating on the non-rapid eye movement stage 2 (NREM 2) as a potentially better defined and a more reliable time point that separates sleep from the wake, on the sleep wake continuum. Conclusions: The neurophysiologic landscape of sleep onset bears a complex pattern associated with a multitude of behavioural and physiological markers and remains poorly understood. The methodological variation and a heterogenous definition of the wake-sleep transition in various studies to date is understandable, given that sleep onset is a process that has fluctuating and ill-defined boundaries. Nonetheless, the principled characterisation of the sleep onset process is needed which will allow for a greater conceptualisation of the mechanisms underlying this process, further influencing the efficacy of current treatments for sleep disorders.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper represents independent research in part funded by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.en_US
dc.format.extent4530 - 4543-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAME Publishingen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © Journal of Thoracic Disease 2023. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectsleep onseten_US
dc.subjectsleep onset period (SOP)en_US
dc.subjectneurophysiologyen_US
dc.titleThe neurophysiologic landscape of the sleep onset: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-325-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Thoracic Disease-
pubs.issue8-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume15-
dc.identifier.eissn2077-6624-
dc.rights.holderJournal of Thoracic Disease-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © © Journal of Thoracic Disease 2023. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.712.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons