Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27487
Title: Using team-based learning to optimize undergraduate family medicine clerkship training: mixed methods study
Authors: Jackson, L
Otaki, F
Keywords: team-based learning;family medicine;medical education;students;satisfaction;adult learning;experiential education;constructivist learning theory;social constructionism;situated learning theory;team cohesion;students;engagement
Issue Date: 8-Jun-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature)
Citation: Jackson, L. and Otaki, F. (2023) 'Using team-based learning to optimize undergraduate family medicine clerkship training: mixed methods study', BMC Medical Education, 23, 422, pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04240-1.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Background: Team-Based Learning (TBL) is an established educational strategy which has become increasingly popular in the training of healthcare professionals. TBL is highly suitable for teaching Family Medicine (FM) especially that teamwork and collaborative care, in this medical discipline, are at the core of safe and effective practice. Despite the established suitability of TBL for teaching FM, there are no empirical studies that capture the students’ perception of a TBL in FM undergraduate learning experience in the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA). Objective: The overall objective of this study was to investigate the perception of students regarding a TBL in FM intervention (in Dubai, United Arab Emirates), that was designed and implemented in alignment with a constructivist learning theory. Methods: A convergent mixed methods study design was utilized to develop a thorough understanding of the students’ perceptions. Qualitative and quantitative data were concurrently collected and independently analyzed. The output of thematic analysis was systematically merged with the quantitative descriptive and inferential findings using the iterative joint display process. Results: The qualitative findings shed light on the students’ perception of TBL in FM, and the interplay between team cohesion and engagement with the course. As for the quantitative findings, they showed that the percentage of the total average of the Satisfaction with TBL in FM score was 88.80%. As for change in impression of FM discipline, the percentage of the total average was 83.10%. The perception of team cohesion, with a mean of agreement of 8.62(1.34), seemed to be significantly associated with the students’ perception of the team test phase component, only (P < 0.05). As for the perception of the level of engagement with the course, with a mean of agreement of 9.29(0.84), it turned out to be significantly associated with the change in impression of FM discipline (P < 0.05). Lastly, the joint display analysis showed how the quantitative and qualitative findings built upon each other, revealing how best to leverage TBL in FM trainings. Conclusion: The current study showed that TBL embedded in a FM clinical clerkship was well-received by students. It is worth leveraging the lessons learned from the first-hand experience reported upon in the current study to optimize the utilization of TBL in FM.
Description: Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request..
Supplementary Information is available online at: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-023-04240-1#Sec19 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27487
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04240-1
Other Identifiers: 422
Appears in Collections:Brunel Medical School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.2.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons