Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27642
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTrivedi, P-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, S-
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, G-
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, T-
dc.contributor.authorMan, WD-C-
dc.contributor.authorNolan, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T08:19:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-16T08:19:06Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-17-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Timothy Jenkins https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-0725-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Claire M Nolan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-599X-
dc.identifier.citationTrivedi, P. et al. (2023) 'Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 21 (4), pp. 577 - 584. doi: 10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2329-6933-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27642-
dc.descriptionA CC BY or equivalent licence is applied to the Author Accepted Manuscript arising from this submission, in accordance with the grant’s open access conditions.en_US
dc.description.abstractRationale: Standing from a sitting position is an important activity of daily living. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a simple physical performance test that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded. It can be measured in most healthcare settings, including the home where traditional field walking tests may not be possible. The 5STS has been validated in community-dwelling older adults and people with COPD, but data in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are limited. Objective: The aims of this cohort study were to establish the construct validity, responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and minimal important difference (MID) of the 5STS in IPF. Methods: In 149 people with IPF, we compared 5STS to measures of lung function, exercise capacity, quadriceps strength, breathlessness and health-related quality of life. Responsiveness and effect sizes were determined by measuring 5STS before and after PR. The MID was estimated using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Results: The 5STS correlated significantly with incremental shuttle walk test (ISW) (r=-0.55), isometric quadriceps maximum voluntary contract (QMVC) (r=-0.45), Medical Research Council (MRC) score (r=0.40), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ)-Total (r=-0.21) and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease-Total (r=-0.21) but not forced vital capacity %predicted or quadriceps 1-repetition maximum (1RM). There was a significant but very weak correlation between change in 5STS and change in MRC (r=0.18), ISW (r=-0.21) and CRQ-Total (r=-0.26) but no significant correlation with change in 1RM (-0.12) or QMVC (r=-0.18). 5STS time improved with PR (median (25th, 75th centile) change: -1.97 (-3.47, -0.62) seconds; p<0.001). The effect size for 5STS was 0.66 and higher than quadriceps 1RM, QMVC and ISW. The mean (range) MID estimate was -1.93 (-1.85 to -2.10) seconds. Conclusions: In people with IPF, the 5STS is a valid physical performance measure that is responsive to exercise-based interventions and suitable for use in most healthcare settings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research Doctoral Research Fellowship (2014-07-089), Medical Research Council New Investigator Research Grant (98576), National Institute for Health Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0816-20022).en_US
dc.format.extent577 - 584-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Thoracic Societyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). A Creative Commons (CC BY) Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) or equivalent licence is applied to the Author Accepted Manuscript arising from this submission, in accordance with the grant’s open access conditions. Originally Published in: Trivedi, P. et al. (2023) 'Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 0 (ahead of print), pp. [1] - [23]. DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc (see: https://www.atsjournals.org/general/author).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titleFive-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc-
dc.relation.isPartOfAnnals of the American Thoracic Society-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume21-
dc.identifier.eissn2325-6621-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). A Creative Commons (CC BY) Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) or equivalent licence is applied to the Author Accepted Manuscript arising from this submission, in accordance with the grant’s open access conditions. Originally Published in: Trivedi, P. et al. (2023) 'Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 0 (ahead of print), pp. [1] - [23]. DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc (see: https://www.atsjournals.org/general/author).880.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons