Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27890
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHislop, J-
dc.contributor.authorOrth, D-
dc.contributor.authorTirosh, O-
dc.contributor.authorIsaksson, M-
dc.contributor.authorHensman, C-
dc.contributor.authorMcCormick, J-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T08:36:49Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-20T08:36:49Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-11-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Dominic Orth https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8844-3815-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Oren Tirosh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-6399-
dc.identifier.citationHislop, J. (2023) 'Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis', Surgical Endoscopy, 37 (9), pp. 6640 - 6659. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10228-1.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27890-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2023 Introduction: Hand size, strength, and stature all impact a surgeon’s ability to perform Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) comfortably and effectively. This is due to limitations in instrument and operating room design. This article aims to review performance, pain, and tool usability data based on biological sex and anthropometry. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched in May 2023. Retrieved articles were screened based on whether a full-text, English article was available in which original results were stratified by biological sex or physical proportions. Article quality was discussed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were summarized in three main themes: task performance, physical discomfort, and tool usability and fit. Task completion times, pain prevalence, and grip style results between male and female surgeons formed three meta-analyses. Results: A total of 1354 articles were sourced, and 54 were deemed suitable for inclusion. The collated results showed that female participants, predominantly novices, took 2.6–30.1 s longer to perform standardized laparoscopic tasks. Female surgeons reported pain at double the frequency of their male colleagues. Female surgeons and those with a smaller glove size were consistently more likely to report difficulty and require modified (potentially suboptimal) grip techniques with standard laparoscopic tools. Conclusions: The pain and stress reported by female or small-handed surgeons when using laparoscopic tools demonstrates the need for currently available instrument handles, including robotic hand controls, to become more size-inclusive. However, this study is limited by reporting bias and inconsistencies; furthermore, most data was collected in a simulated environment. Additional research into how anthropometric tool design impacts the live operating performance of experienced female surgeons would further inform this area of investigation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This review was commissioned and funded by CMR Surgical Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent6640 - 6659-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectgenderen_US
dc.subjectdiscomforten_US
dc.subjectergonomicsen_US
dc.subjectinjuryen_US
dc.subjecttraditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS)en_US
dc.titleDoes surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10228-1-
dc.relation.isPartOfSurgical Endoscopy-
pubs.issue9-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume37-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2218-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.2.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons