Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28247
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGervais, WM-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T16:46:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-07T16:46:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-29-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Will M. Gervais https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7790-1665-
dc.identifier.citationGervais, W.M. (2021) 'Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory', Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16 (4), pp. 827 - 843. doi: 10.1177/1745691620977471.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-6916-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28247-
dc.description.abstractIn the face of unreplicable results, statistical anomalies, and outright fraud, introspection and changes in the psychological sciences have taken root. Vibrant reform and metascience movements have emerged. These are exciting developments and may point toward practical improvements in the future. Yet there is nothing so practical as good theory. This article outlines aspects of reform and metascience in psychology that are ripe for an injection of theory, including a lot of excellent and overlooked theoretical work from different disciplines. I review established frameworks that model the process of scientific discovery, the types of scientific networks that we ought to aspire to, and the processes by which problematic norms and institutions might evolve, focusing especially on modeling from the philosophy of science and cultural evolution. We have unwittingly evolved a toxic scientific ecosystem; existing interdisciplinary theory may help us intelligently design a better one.en_US
dc.format.extent827 - 843-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publiations on behalf of Association for Psychological Scienceen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectmetascienceen_US
dc.subjectmethods reformen_US
dc.subjectphilosophy of scienceen_US
dc.subjectcultural evolutionen_US
dc.subjectmodelingen_US
dc.subjectnormsen_US
dc.subjectdiversity and inclusionen_US
dc.subjecttheoryen_US
dc.titlePractical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620977471-
dc.relation.isPartOfPerspectives on Psychological Science-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume16-
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6924-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).1.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons