Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28816
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdair, LE-
dc.contributor.authorLozano, N-
dc.contributor.authorFerenczi, N-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T17:57:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-19T17:57:53Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-01-
dc.identifierORCiD: Lora Adair https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8965-3221-
dc.identifierORCiD: Nicole Lozano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-8305-
dc.identifierORCiD: Nelli Ferenczi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-6244-
dc.identifier.citationAdair, L, Lozano, N. and Ferenczi, N. (2024) 'Abortion Attitudes Across Cultural Contexts: Exploring the Role of Gender Inequality, Abortion Policy, and Individual Values', International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 13 (3), pp. 138 - 152. doi: 10.1027/2157-3891/a000101.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2157-3883-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28816-
dc.descriptionOpen Data: The information needed to reproduce all of the reported results is available via Figshare—data (https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.24119271) and syntax (https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.24119307) are both publicly available.en_US
dc.descriptionPart of a special issue: Reproductive Justice – Global and Psychological Perspectives.-
dc.description.abstractWe explored between-country and within-country variability in abortion attitudes, using country-level factors (e.g., gender equality) and individual-level factors (e.g., gender role attitudes) as predictors. Participants from Mexico (N = 215), India (N = 215), the United States (N = 215), and the United Kingdom (N = 206) were recruited via Qualtrics Panels. Regression models and ANOVAs were used to assess whether estimates of gender inequality, gender role attitudes, motherhood norms, belief in big/moralizing gods, and sexual strategy were associated with abortion attitudes. As predicted, individuals living in countries with greater gender inequality, and more restrictive abortion policy, reported more restrictive abortion attitudes and stronger support for banning abortion. Furthermore, individuals who endorsed more traditional gender role ideologies, who reported belief in big/moralizing gods and who used long-term sexual strategies also reported more restrictive abortion attitudes and stronger support for banning abortion. Exploratory analyses highlight how these relationships vary as a function of cultural context. We can conclude that both contextual factors (e.g., local abortion legislation and gender inequality) as well as individual factors (e.g., gender role attitudes and religious/spiritual belief) shape people’s attitudes toward abortion. Implications regarding the bidirectional relationship between attitudes and policy in reproductive health are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent138 - 152-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHogrefe on behalf of American Psychological Associationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectabortion attitudesen_US
dc.subjectreproductive healthen_US
dc.subjectabortion legislationen_US
dc.subjectgender rolesen_US
dc.subjectreligious beliefsen_US
dc.titleAbortion Attitudes Across Cultural Contexts: Exploring the Role of Gender Inequality, Abortion Policy, and Individual Valuesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000101-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume13-
dc.identifier.eissn2157-3891-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).551.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons