Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28948
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHan, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, P-
dc.contributor.authorWinters, J-
dc.contributor.authorKemp, C-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T15:18:40Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-07T15:18:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-02-
dc.identifierORCiD: James Winters https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2982-2991-
dc.identifierORCiD: Charles Kemp https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-8737-
dc.identifier.citationHan, S.J. et al. (2022) 'Simplification Is Not Dominant in the Evolution of Chinese Characters', Open Mind, 6, pp. 264 - 279. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00064.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28948-
dc.descriptionCode and data are available at https://github.com/cskemp/chinesecharacters.en_US
dc.descriptionThe preregistration is available at https://aspredicted.org/x76et.pdf.-
dc.description.abstractLinguistic systems are hypothesised to be shaped by pressures towards communicative efficiency that drive processes of simplification. A longstanding illustration of this idea is the claim that Chinese characters have progressively simplified over time. Here we test this claim by analyzing a dataset with more than half a million images of Chinese characters spanning more than 3,000 years of recorded history. We find no consistent evidence of simplification through time, and contrary to popular belief we find that modern Chinese characters are higher in visual complexity than their earliest known counterparts. One plausible explanation for our findings is that simplicity trades off with distinctiveness, and that characters have become less simple because of pressures towards distinctiveness. Our findings are therefore compatible with functional accounts of language but highlight the diverse and sometimes counterintuitive ways in which linguistic systems are shaped by pressures for communicative efficiency.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunder(s): Australian Research Council Award Id(s): FT190100200 Principal Award Recipient(s): Charles Kemp.en_US
dc.format.extent264 - 279-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMIT Pressen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://github.com/cskemp/chinesecharacters-
dc.relation.urihttps://aspredicted.org/x76et.pdf-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectChinese charactersen_US
dc.subjectcultural evolutionen_US
dc.subjectcommunicative efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectcomplexityen_US
dc.subjectdistinctivenessen_US
dc.titleSimplification Is Not Dominant in the Evolution of Chinese Charactersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2022-10-10-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00064-
dc.relation.isPartOfOpen Mind-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume6-
dc.identifier.eissn2470-2986-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderMassachusetts Institute of Technology-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.2.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons