Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29122
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrice, ME-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, DDP-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-05T07:03:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-05T07:03:22Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-08-
dc.identifierORCiD: Michael E. Price https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-4326-
dc.identifier.citationPrice, M.E. and Johnson, D.D.P.. (2024) 'Science and religion around the world: Compatibility between belief systems predicts increased wellbeing', Religion, Brain and Behavior, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 20. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2024.2363773en_US
dc.identifier.issn2153-599X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29122-
dc.description.abstractPrevious research, conducted mainly in Western societies, indicates that religious/spiritual (R/S) and pro-science belief systems each relate positively to believer well-being, but are perceived as being highly incompatible with each other. This perception would presumably undermine one's ability to benefit fully from both systems, leading to the research questions examined here: does the perceived incompatibility between religion and science vary cross-culturally, and is this level of incompatibility itself related to group member well-being? Our data set included 55,230 participants from 54 countries, organized for analytical purposes into 13 global regions and 11 belief groups. We found that perceived incompatibility between R/S and pro-science beliefs was indeed characteristic of the West but was not the norm cross-culturally. We also found that higher levels of belief system compatibility related positively to well-being, and especially to the strength of positive associations between well-being and each type of belief system. That is, in regions and belief groups that perceived higher compatibility, well-being's positive relationships with R/S and pro-science beliefs were both also higher. We speculate about compatibility's potential causal effects on these relationships, noting that as compatibility increases, so does the possibility of benefiting from one system without forgoing the benefits of the other.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Issachar Fund and the Templeton Religion Trust [grant number TRT0207].en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 20-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectreligion and scienceen_US
dc.subjectspiritualityen_US
dc.subjectwell-beingen_US
dc.subjecthealthen_US
dc.subjectcross-cultural religious beliefsen_US
dc.titleScience and religion around the world: Compatibility between belief systems predicts increased wellbeingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-03-31-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2024.2363773-
dc.relation.isPartOfReligion, Brain and Behavior-
pubs.issue00-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn2153-5981-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.1.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons