Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29296
Title: Loss Analysis in Radial Inflow Turbines for Supercritical CO<inf>2</inf> Mixtures
Other Titles: Loss Analysis in Radial Inflow Turbines for Supercritical CO2 Mixtures
Authors: Aqel, O
White, M
Sayma, A
Keywords: radial inflow turbine;CO2 mixtures;transcritical CO2 cycles;turbine aerodynamic design;loss analysis
Issue Date: 16-Jan-2024
Publisher: American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Citation: Aqel, O., White, M. and Sayma, A. (2024) 'Loss Analysis in Radial Inflow Turbines for Supercritical CO<inf>2</inf> Mixtures', Journal of Turbomachinery, 146 (5), 051003, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1115/1.4064193.
Abstract: Recent studies suggest that CO2 mixtures can reduce the costs of concentrated solar power plants. Radial inflow turbines (RIT) are considered suitable for small to medium-sized CO2 power plants (100 kW to 10 MW) due to aerodynamic and cost factors. This paper quantifies the impact of CO2 doping on RIT design by comparing 1D mean-line designs and aerodynamic losses of pure CO2 RITs with three CO2 mixtures: titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and hexafluorobenzene (C6F6). Results show that turbine designs share similar rotor shapes and velocity diagrams for all working fluids. However, factors like clearance-to-blade height ratio, turbine pressure ratio, and fluid viscosity cause differences in turbine efficiency. When normalized for these factors, differences in total-to-static efficiency become less than 0.1%. However, imposing rotational speed limits reveals greater differences in turbine designs and efficiencies. The imposition of rotational speed limits reduces total-to-static efficiency across all fluids, with a maximum 15% reduction in 0.1 MW CO2 compared to a 3% reduction in CO2/TiCl4 turbines of the same power. Among the studied mixtures, CO2/TiCl4 turbines achieve the highest efficiency, followed by CO2/C6F6 and CO2/SO2. For example, 100 kW turbines achieve total-to-static efficiencies of 80.0%, 77.4%, 78.1%, and 75.5% for CO2/TiCl4, CO2/C6F6, CO2/SO2, and pure CO2, respectively. In 10 MW turbines, efficiencies are 87.8%, 87.3%, 87.5%, and 87.2% in the same order.
Description: Data Availability Statement: The datasets generated and supporting the findings of this article are obtainable from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Paper No: TURBO-23-1236
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29296
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064193
ISSN: 0889-504X
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Abdulnaser Sayma https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-0004
051003
TURBO-23-1236
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 by ASME / The Authors; reuse license CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons