Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29373
Title: Machine learning for optimal design of circular hollow section stainless steel stub columns: A comparative analysis with Eurocode 3 predictions
Authors: Abarkan, I
Rabi, M
Vendramell Ferreira, FP
Shamass, R
Limbachiya, V
Jweihan, YS
Pinho Santos, LF
Keywords: circular hollow sections;stainless steel;finite element model;artificial neural network;support vector machine regression;gene expression programming;decision trees for regression
Issue Date: 15-Feb-2024
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Abarkan, I. et al. (2024) 'Machine learning for optimal design of circular hollow section stainless steel stub columns: A comparative analysis with Eurocode 3 predictions', Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 132, 107952, pp. 1 - 20. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107952.
Abstract: Stainless steel has many advantages when used in structures, however, the initial cost is high. Hence, it is essential to develop reliable and accurate design methods that can optimize the material. As novel, reliable soft computation methods, machine learning provided more accurate predictions than analytical formulae and solved highly complex problems. The present study aims to develop machine learning models to predict the cross-section resistance of circular hollow section stainless steel stub column. A parametric study is conducted by varying the diameter, thickness, length, and mechanical properties of the column. This database is used to train, validate, and test machine learning models, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Trees for Regression (DTR), Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Support Vector Machine Regression (SVMR). Thereafter, results are compared with finite element models and Eurocode 3 (EC3) to assess their accuracy. It was concluded that the EC3 models provided conservative predictions with an average Predicted-to-Actual ratio of 0.698 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 437.3. The machine learning models presented the highest level of accuracy. However, the SVMR model based on RBF kernel presented a better performance than the ANN, GEP and DTR machine learning models, and RMSE value for SVMR, ANN, GEP and DTR is 22.6, 31.6, 152.84 and 29.07, respectively. The GEP leads to the lowest level of accuracy among the other three machine learning models, yet, it is more accurate than EC3. The machine learning models were implemented in a user-friendly tool, which can be used for design purposes.
Description: Data availability: Data will be made available on request.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29373
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107952
ISSN: 0952-1976
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Ikram Abarkan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1269-1553
ORCiD: Rabee Shamass https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-8227
ORCiD: Vireen Limbachiya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0835-8464
ORCiD: Yazeed S. Jweihan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-2942
ORCiD: Luis Fernando Pinho Santos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-8752
107952
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).13.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons