Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29510
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvan der Gaag, A-
dc.contributor.authorJago, R-
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, A-
dc.contributor.authorStathis, K-
dc.contributor.authorWebster, M-
dc.contributor.authorAustin, Z-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T12:56:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-06T12:56:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-20-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ann Gallagher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-024X-
dc.identifier.citationvan der Gaag, A. et al. (2023) 'Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Regulation: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Nurse Regulators in Three Jurisdictions', Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2023, 14 (2), pp. 10 - 17. doi: 10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00087-X.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2155-8256-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29510-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to a broad group of technologies that are increasingly commonplace in everyday life; however, they have had only limited application in regulatory practice. Purpose: The present study explored nursing regulators’ perceptions of the role and value of AI in regulation and potential barriers and facilitators to the uptake and implementation of AI. Methods: Three facilitated focus group sessions with 28 representatives of regulators from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States were conducted. Content analysis of verbatim transcripts was completed. Results: Key themes that emerged included (a) interest in how AI could enhance sustainability and improve cost-effectiveness of certain regulatory processes and (b) concerns regarding how the term “artificial intelligence” itself could be problematic. Specific barriers to the uptake of AI in regulation included concerns regarding codification of system bias, negative public perception, and lack of clarity around accountability for decision-making. Facilitators to implementation included enhancing the consistency of processes and improving the decision-making and utility in supporting trend analyses and audit functions. Conclusion: Additional work in exploring how best to incorporate evolving AI technologies in regulatory practice—and what they should be named—is required, but these findings suggest that promising outcomes may lie ahead.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for this research was provided in part through an unrestricted grant from the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) of the United States of America.en_US
dc.format.extent10 - 17-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier on behalf of National Council of State Boards of Nursingen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 National Council of State Boards of Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectregulatory practiceen_US
dc.subjectnursing regulationen_US
dc.subjecthealth professions regulationen_US
dc.subjectregulatory bodiesen_US
dc.titleArtificial Intelligence in Health Professions Regulation: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Nurse Regulators in Three Jurisdictionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00087-X-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Nursing Regulation-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn2155-8264-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/leglacode.en-
dc.rights.holderNational Council of State Boards of Nursing-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 National Council of State Boards of Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).429.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons