Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29680
Title: Conflicting versus reinforcing private information, information aggregation, and the time series properties of asset prices
Authors: Schnitzlein, C
Chelley-Steeley, P
Steeley, JM
Issue Date: 7-Sep-2024
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Schnitzlein, C. Chelley-Steeley, P. and Steeley, J.M. (2024) 'Conflicting versus reinforcing private information, information aggregation, and the time series properties of asset prices, 169, 107300, pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107300
Abstract: We study how the relationship between independent private information signals affects information aggregation in laboratory asset markets. We employ two mechanisms, a continuous double auction and a prediction market. Under both mechanisms, when information is reinforcing, partial information aggregation occurs. When information is in conflict, information aggregation lessens and attempts to profit from private information frequently harm informational efficiency. In both mechanisms, results become stronger with experience in previous experimental sessions, and provide a private information benchmark for studies of the implications of conflicting public information. Under reasonable assumptions, our results are consistent with both momentum effects and weak reversals.
Description: Data availability: Data will be made available on request.
Supplementary materials: Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624002140?via%3Dihub#sec0024 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29680
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107300
ISSN: 0378-4266
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: James M. Steeley https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-5089
107300
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).1.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons