Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29772
Title: Can we get more satisfaction? Improving quality of working life survey results in UK universities
Authors: Qudah, S
Davies, J
Deakin, R
Keywords: quality of working life;UK higher education;human resource management policies;management practices;satisfaction surveys
Issue Date: 30-Oct-2018
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group)
Citation: Qudah, S., Davies, J. and Deakin, R. (2019) 'Can we get more satisfaction? Improving quality of working life survey results in UK universities', Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23 (2-3), pp. 39 - 47. doi: 10.1080/13603108.2018.1534758.
Abstract: The quality of working life (QoWL) has preoccupied practitioners and management scholars since the 1960s [Grote, G., and D. Guest. 2017. “The Case for Reinvigorating Quality of Working Life Research.” Human Relations 70 (2): 149–167. doi:10.1177/0018726716654746], while satisfaction and occupational stress for professional and academic staff in universities are issues of growing concern amidst a context of poor student mental health literacy [Gorczynski, P., W. Sims-Schouten, D. Hill, and J. C. Wilson. 2017. “Examining Mental Health Literacy, Help Seeking Behaviours, and Mental Health Outcomes in UK University Students.” The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice 12 (2): 111–120]. The enhancement of QoWL appears increasingly difficult to achieve within the UK higher education (HE) sector, with constant external and internal reforms [Bessant, C., and S. Mavin. 2016. “Neglected on the Front Line: Tensions and Challenges for the First-Line Manager-Academic Role in UK Business Schools.” Journal of Management Development 35 (7): 916–929. doi:10.1108/JMD-09-2014-0105], the “tyranny of metrics” [Muller, J. Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press], and the continuous decline in QoWL survey results, which became an issue for many UK universities [Denvir, A., J. Hillage, A. Cox, A. Sinclair, and D. Pearmain. 2008. “Quality of Working Life in the UK.” http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/452.pdf]. Furthermore, there is little understanding of how university HR departments enhance QoWL [Yeo, R. K., and J. Li. 2011. “Working Out the Quality of Work Life: A Career Development Perspective with Insights for Human Resource Management.” Human Resource Management International Digest 19 (3): 39–45. doi:10.1108/09670731111125952]. This paper presents a new perspective by looking at the role of HR and management in achieving QoWL in the UK's HE sector. The incongruity between strategic human resource management metrics in the HE sector to measure employee well-being and self-reported employee satisfaction has a significant influence on student satisfaction, particularly in large units like business schools. Drawing on secondary data, we contribute to debates on current challenges faced by UK universities and offer practical suggestions to improve QoWL.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1534758
ISSN: 1360-3108
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Sumayyah Qudah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-4836
ORCiD: Julie Davies http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-3100
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2018 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education on 30 Oct 2018, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13603108.2018.1534758 (see: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/). It is archived on this institutional repository under a CC BY-NC licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons