Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29884
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAncliffe, L-
dc.contributor.authorCastle, EM-
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, TJ-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, HML-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T09:29:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-06T09:29:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-12-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ellen M. Caastle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108-
dc.identifier302-
dc.identifier.citationAncliffe, L. et al. (2024) 'A national survey of current rehabilitation service provisions for people living with chronic kidney disease in the UK: implications for policy and practice', BMC Nephrology, 25, 302, pp. 1 - 13. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03742-4.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29884-
dc.descriptionData availability: Data available from corresponding author upon request; lisa.ancliffe@nhs.net.en_US
dc.descriptionElectronic supplementary material is available online at: https://bmcnephrol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12882-024-03742-4#Sec30 .-
dc.description.abstractBackground: National guidance recognises the key role of rehabilitation in improving outcomes for people living with chronic kidney disease. Implementation of this guidance is reliant upon an adequate and skilled rehabilitation workforce. Data relating to this is currently lacking within the UK. This survey aimed to identify variations and good practices in kidney physiotherapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT) and clinical exercise physiologist (CEP) provision; and to understand barriers to implementation. Methods: An online survey was sent to all 87 UK kidney units between June 2022 and January 2023. Data was collected on the provision of therapy services, barriers to service provision and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The quantitative survey was analysed using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were explored using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Forty-five units (52%) responded. Seventeen (38%) units reported having a PT and 15 (33%) an OT with a specialist kidney role; one unit (7%) had access to a CEP. Thirty units (67%) offered inpatient therapy services, ten (22%) outpatient therapy clinics, six (13%) intradialytic exercise, six (13%) symptom management and three (7%) outpatient rehabilitation. Qualitative data revealed lack of money/funding and time (both n = 35, 85% and n = 34, 83% respectively) were the main barriers to delivering kidney-specific therapy. Responders saw an increase in the complexity of their caseload, a reduction in staffing levels and consequently, service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemplars of innovative service delivery, including hybrid digital and remote services, were viewed as positive responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Despite clear evidence of the benefits of rehabilitation, across the UK, there remains limited and variable access to kidney-specific therapy services. Equitable access to kidney-specific rehabilitation services is urgently required to support people to ‘live well’ with kidney disease.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHMLY is funded by the NIHR [NIHR302926].en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 13-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC (part of Springer Nature)-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectallied health professionalen_US
dc.subjectchronic kidney diseaseen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectwell-beingen_US
dc.subjectphysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectoccupational therapyen_US
dc.subjectclinical exercise physiologisten_US
dc.subjectworkforceen_US
dc.titleA national survey of current rehabilitation service provisions for people living with chronic kidney disease in the UK: Implications for policy and practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-09-03-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03742-4-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC Nephrology-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.volume25-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2369-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.1.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons