Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Larrosa, ES-
dc.contributor.authorRiveras, M-
dc.contributor.authorOldfield, M-
dc.contributor.authorShaheen, AF-
dc.contributor.authorSchlotthauer, G-
dc.contributor.authorCatalfamo-Formento, P-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-30T10:01:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-30T10:01:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-28-
dc.identifierORCiD: Aliah F Shaheen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-8818-
dc.identifierORCiD: Paola Catalfamo-Formento https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-9792-
dc.identifier.citationMuñoz-Larrosa, G.S. et al. (2024) 'Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm', Journal of Biomechanics, 177, 112384, pp. 1 - 6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9290-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30283-
dc.descriptionSupplementary materials are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004627?via%3Dihub#s0045 .en_US
dc.description.abstractSeveral kinematic-based algorithms have shown accuracy for gait event detection in unimpaired and pathological gait. However, their validation in subjects with lower limb amputation while walking on different terrains is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three kinematic-based algorithms: Coordinate-Based Algorithm (CBA), Velocity-Based Algorithm (VBA) and High-Pass Filtered Algorithms (HPA) for detection of gait events in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on different terrains. Twelve subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation, using a hydraulic ankle prosthesis, walked at self-selected walking speed, on level ground and up and down a slope. Detection of Initial Contact (IC) and Foot Off (FO) by the three algorithms for intact and prosthetic limbs was compared with detection by force platforms using the True Error (TE) (time difference in detection). Mean TE found for over 100 events analysed per condition were smaller than 40 ms for both events in all conditions (approximately 6 % of stance phase). Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found between terrain and algorithm, limb and algorithm, and also a main effect for the algorithm. Post-hoc analyses indicate that the algorithm, the limb and the terrain had an effect on the accuracy in detection. If an accuracy of 40 ms is acceptable for the particular application, then all three algorithms can be used for event detection in amputee gait. However, if accuracy in detection of events is crucial for the intended application, an evaluation of the algorithms in pathological gait walking on the terrain of interest is recommended.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 6-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectlevel grounden_US
dc.subjectslopeen_US
dc.subjectrampInitial contacten_US
dc.subjectfoot offen_US
dc.titleGait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-10-22-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Biomechanics-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume177-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2380-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderElsevier Ltd.-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 28 October 2025. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).532.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Supplementary Material.pdfEmbargoed until 28 October 2025149.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons