Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30305
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBircan, T-
dc.contributor.authorÖzbilgin, MF-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-03T17:54:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-03T17:54:22Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-02-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mustafa F. Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534-
dc.identifier123925-
dc.identifier.citationBircan, T. and Özbilgin, M.F. (2025) 'Unmasking inequalities of the code: Disentangling the nexus of AI and inequality', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 211 (February 2025), 123925, pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123925.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30305-
dc.descriptionData availability: No data was used for the research described in the article.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article provides an interdisciplinary exploration of the complex dynamics between artificial intelligence (AI) and inequality, drawing upon social sciences and technology studies. It scrutinises the power dynamics that shape the development, deployment, and utilisation of AI technologies, and how these dynamics influence access to and control over AI resources. To do so, we employ Margaret Archer's social realism framework to illuminate the ways in which AI systems can reinforce various forms of inequalities. This theoretical perspective underscores the dynamic interplay between social context, individual agency, and the processes of morphostasis and morphogenesis, offering a nuanced understanding of how inequalities are reproduced and potentially transformed within the AI context. We further discuss the challenges posed by the access and opportunity divide, privacy and surveillance concerns, and the digital divide in the context of AI. We propose co-ownership as a potential solution to economic inequalities induced by AI, suggesting that stakeholders contributing to AI development should have significant claims of ownership. We also advocate for the recognition of AI systems as legal entities, which could provide a mechanism for accountability and compensation in cases of privacy breaches. Finally, we conclude by emphasising the need for robust data governance frameworks, global governance, and a commitment to social justice in navigating the complex landscape of AI and inequality.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research is supported by the European Commission through the Horizon 2020 European project: “HumMingBird – Enhanced migration measures from a multidimensional perspective” (GA: 870661).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectsocial realismen_US
dc.subjectinequalityen_US
dc.subjectdigital divideen_US
dc.subjectalgorithmic biasen_US
dc.subjectprivacy and surveillanceen_US
dc.titleUnmasking inequalities of the code: Disentangling the nexus of AI and inequalityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-11-27-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123925-
dc.relation.isPartOfTechnological Forecasting and Social Change-
pubs.issueFebruary 2025-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume211-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5509-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode,en-
dc.rights.holderElsevier Ltd.-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 2 Jun 2026. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).534.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons