Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30660
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CY-
dc.contributor.authorYam, WS-
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, MD-
dc.contributor.authorClarke, S-
dc.contributor.authorMan, WDC-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, NJ-
dc.contributor.authorNolan, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T16:36:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-04T16:36:48Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-22-
dc.identifierORCiD: William D.C. Man https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3782-659X-
dc.identifierORCiD: Nicola J. Roberts https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7589-8113-
dc.identifierORCiD: Claire M Nolan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-599X-
dc.identifier.citationCheung C.Y. et al. (2025) ‘Is videoconference pulmonary rehabilitation associated with improvements in knowledge in people living with COPD? A propensity-matched service-evaluation’. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 22, pp 1 – 4. doi:10.1177/14799731241310895.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1479-9723-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30660-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services are increasingly using alternative programme delivery modes, for example telerehabilitation strategies including videoconferencing, to improve patient choice and accessibility. Although telerehabilitation results in improvements in core outcomes, the effect on knowledge attainment is not known. Aim: To observe the real-world responses of patients choosing to undergo videoconference PR to a matched control group choosing to undergo in-person PR, in terms of knowledge attainment. Methods: Using propensity score matching, 25 people with COPD who completed videoconference PR were matched 1:1 with a control group of 25 people with COPD who completed in-person PR. Knowledge attainment was measured using the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ). Results: There was a statistically and clinically significant improvement in LINQ score in both groups (mean (95%CI): videoconference −3.2 (−4.7 to −1.6); in-person −3.0 (−4.5 to −1.4)), with no significant between-group difference (mean (95%CI): 0.2 (−2.0 to −2.4)). 76% and 80% of participants achieved the minimal important difference of the LINQ in the videoconference and in-person PR groups respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, this real-world service evaluation indicates that videoconference PR may be associated with similar improvements in knowledge attainment as in-person PR, but this requires corroboration due to the small sample size.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.-
dc.format.extent1 - 4-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectCOPDen_US
dc.subjectvideoconference pulmonary rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectpulmonary rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectknowledgeen_US
dc.subjectlung information needs questionnaireen_US
dc.titleIs videoconference pulmonary rehabilitation associated with improvements in knowledge in people living with COPD? A propensity-matched service-evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241310895-
dc.relation.isPartOfChronic Respiratory Disease-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume22-
dc.identifier.eissn1479-9731-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-12-10-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).503.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons