Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30735
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastelli, F-
dc.contributor.authorMian, O-
dc.contributor.authorBruton, A-
dc.contributor.authorChembila Valappil, A-
dc.contributor.authorTillin, N-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T10:04:33Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-15T10:04:33Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-22-
dc.identifierORCiD: Federico Castelli https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5760-7129-
dc.identifierORCiD: Adam Bruton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-7499-
dc.identifier.citationCastelli, F. et al (2025) 'Test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractions', European Journal of Applied Physiology, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05707-3.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1439-6319-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30735-
dc.descriptionData availability: The data collected and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.descriptionSupplementary Information is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-025-05707-3#Sec21 .-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study assessed the test–retest reliability of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent periods at early, middle, and late phases of the rising time–torque curve during explosive voluntary contractions. We also investigated how the number of consecutively averaged measurements influenced reliability. Methods: On two separate occasions 3–7 days apart, 14 adults performed several isometric explosive (1-s) contractions of the knee extensors, some of which were superimposed with TMS to elicit MEPs in the superficial quadriceps. Of those with TMS, stimulation was timed to elicit MEPs at either 45 (early), 115 (middle), or 190 ms (late) following contraction onset (16 with-TMS contractions per time condition). TMS was also superimposed at the plateau of 15 separate MVCs. Test–retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for MEPs and silent periods consecutively averaged over 3 to 15 separate contractions. Results: No one condition/phase was more reliable than another. For MEP amplitude, in all conditions except the explosive late phase, ICCs generally increased, and CV decreased, with an increase in the number of averaged contractions, and were > 0.50 ICC and < 15% CV within seven contractions. For silent period, ICCs and CVs were unaffected by the number of consecutively averaged contractions and remained > 0.50 ICC and < 10% CV. Conclusion: Test–retest reliability of TMS responses is comparable between phases of explosive contraction and at the plateau of MVC. To maximise reliability of MEPs during explosive contractions or MVCs, we recommend future studies average data across more than the 3–5 contractions typically reported in the literature investigating MEPs at MVC plateau.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 14-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectcorticospinal excitability-
dc.subjecttranscranial magnetic stimulation-
dc.subjectexplosive contractions-
dc.subjecttest–retest-
dc.subjectrate of force development-
dc.titleTest-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05707-3-
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology-
pubs.issue00-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1439-6327-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.993.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons