Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30790
Title: Implicit bias in referrals to relational psychological therapies: review and recommendations for mental health services
Authors: Mandangu, C
Ramos, AM
Sengupta, M
Bender, R
El-Hayani, R
Hasan, I
Okechukwu, H
Anas, S
Havsteen-Franklin, D
Keywords: thematic review;implicit bias;indirect discrimination;healthcare;psychiatry;influence mapping;relational psychological therapies
Issue Date: 7-Feb-2025
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Citation: Mandangu, C. et al. (2025) 'Implicit bias in referrals to relational psychological therapies: review and recommendations for mental health services', Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1469439, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469439.
Abstract: Introduction: Timely and appropriate psychological treatment is an essential element required to address the growing burden of mental health issues, which has significant implications for individuals, society, and healthcare systems. However, research indicates that implicit biases among mental health professionals may influence referral decisions, potentially leading to disparities in access to relational psychological therapies. This study investigates bias in referral practices within mental health services, identifying key themes in referral procedures and proposing recommendations to mitigate bias and promote equitable access. Methods: A systematic review of literature published between 2002 and 2022 was conducted, focusing on biases, referral practices, and relational psychological therapies. The search strategy involved full-text screening of studies meeting inclusion criteria, specifically those examining professional and organizational implicit bias in mental health referrals. Thematic synthesis was employed to analyze and categorize bias within these domains, providing a structured framework for understanding its impact on referral decision making processes. Results: The search yielded 2,964 relevant papers, of which 77 underwent full-text screening. Ultimately, eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the review. The analysis revealed that bias development mechanisms in referral decisions occurred across five key domains: resource allocation, organizational procedures, clinical roles, decision-making, and referral preferences. These domains highlight organizational and practitioner-level factors contributing to disparities in access to psychological therapies. Discussion: Findings suggest that implicit biases within referral processes can limit equitable access to psychological therapies, particularly relational therapies that emphasize therapeutic alliance and patient-centered care. This study provides recommendations to address these biases, including standardized referral guidelines, enhanced professional training on implicit bias, and improved oversight mechanisms within mental health services.
Description: Data availability statement: The dataset supporting this study is publicly available on Brunel University's Figshare repository. It can be accessed at the following link: https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.27332307.v2.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30790
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469439
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Dominik Havsteen-Franklin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1309-3528
1469439
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 Mandangu, Ramos, Sengupta, Bender, El-Hayani, Hasan, Okechukwu, Anas and Havsteen-Franklin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.840.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons