Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31030
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDyble, M-
dc.contributor.authorMigliano, AB-
dc.contributor.authorPage, AE-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, D-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-12T13:42:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-12T13:42:18Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-22-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mark Dyble https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-1631-
dc.identifierORCiD: Abigail E. Page https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-1569-
dc.identifierORCiD: Daniel Smith https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-2023-
dc.identifierArticle number: e49-
dc.identifier.citationDyble, M. et al. (2021) 'Relatedness within and between Agta residential groups', Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, e49, pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.46.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31030-
dc.descriptionSocial media summary: Agta hunter–gatherers do not experience age- or sex-related differences in relatedness to their campmates.en_US
dc.descriptionData availability: The data and code are available as Supplementary Materials.-
dc.descriptionSupplementary material is available online at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/evolutionary-human-sciences/article/relatedness-within-and-between-agta-residential-groups/BA9602DCFAA9A22DD7C8C738ABE01FAF#supplementary-materials-tab .-
dc.description.abstractTheoretical models relating to the evolution of human behaviour usually make assumptions about the kinship structure of social groups. Since humans were hunter–gatherers for most of our evolutionary history, data on the composition of contemporary hunter–gatherer groups has long been used to inform these models. Although several papers have taken a broad view of hunter–gatherer social organisation, it is also useful to explore data from single populations in more depth. Here, we describe patterns of relatedness among the Palanan Agta, hunter–gatherers from the northern Philippines. Across 271 adults, mean relatedness to adults across the population is r = 0.01 and to adult campmates is r = 0.074, estimates that are similar to those seen in other hunter–gatherers. We also report the distribution of kin across camps, relatedness and age differences between spouses, and the degree of shared reproductive interest between camp mates, a measure that incorporates affinal kinship. For both this this measure (s) and standard relatedness (r), we see no major age or sex differences in the relatedness of adults to their campmates, conditions that may reduce the potential for conflicts of interest within social groups.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipA.B.M. received funding from the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. RP2011-R 045).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecthunter–gatherersen_US
dc.subjectrelatednessen_US
dc.subjectsocial organisationen_US
dc.subjectAgtaen_US
dc.subjectkinship dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectaffinal kinen_US
dc.titleRelatedness within and between Agta residential groupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.46-
dc.relation.isPartOfEvolutionary Human Sciences-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume3-
dc.identifier.eissn2513-843X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.332.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons