Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31034
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpake, L-
dc.contributor.authorSchaffnit, SB-
dc.contributor.authorPage, AE-
dc.contributor.authorHassan, A-
dc.contributor.authorLynch, R-
dc.contributor.authorWatts, J-
dc.contributor.authorSosis, R-
dc.contributor.authorSear, R-
dc.contributor.authorShenk, MK-
dc.contributor.authorShaver, JH-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-12T15:24:56Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-12T15:24:56Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-27-
dc.identifierORCiD: Abigail E. Page https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-1569-
dc.identifierORCiD: Revbecca Sear https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-0223-
dc.identifier.citationSpake, L. et al. (2024) 'Religious women receive more allomaternal support from non-partner kin in two low-fertility countries', Evolution and Human Behavior, 45 (3), pp. 268 - 280. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.001.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-5138-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31034-
dc.descriptionData availability: The data associated with this research are available on the project's OSF page at: https://osf.io/rg235/ .en_US
dc.descriptionSupplementary data are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000369?via=ihub#s0085 .-
dc.description.abstractIn low fertility settings, religious people tend to have larger families than non-religious people. One way religious individuals may achieve larger relative family sizes is through support from their families. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between religiosity, kin contact, allomaternal investment from relatives, and fertility in two high income low fertility settings: the United Kingdom and the United States. Data for this pre-registered research come from an online survey of 609 women living in the US and 919 women living in the UK, recruited through Prolific, who answered questions about their religious practices, childbirth histories, social networks, and allomaternal networks. We find that, compared with less religious peers, more religious women: 1) have more geographically diffuse kin networks (particularly in the UK) but have social networks that are equally kin-dense; 2) receive more allomaternal support from kin beyond their partner, particularly help with household tasks, though the countries differ in the exhibited relationship between religiosity and partner support; and 3) have higher fertility in both countries. We do not find strong evidence for a mediating role of allomaternal support on the relationship between religiosity and fertility. Our study highlights important variation in the relationship between religion and fertility across two high income low fertility countries and raises new questions about the role that religion plays in allomaternal support networks in these settings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for this study was provided by the John Templeton Foundation [grant number 61426], and the Templeton Religion Trust [grant number TRT-2022-30378].en_US
dc.format.extent268 - 280-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectallomotheringen_US
dc.subjectkin networksen_US
dc.subjectlife history theoryen_US
dc.subjectreligionen_US
dc.subjectbiocultural reproductionen_US
dc.titleReligious women receive more allomaternal support from non-partner kin in two low-fertility countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.001-
dc.relation.isPartOfEvolution and Human Behavior-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume45-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0607-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-04-01-
dc.rights.holderElsevier Inc.-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons