Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31483
Title: | Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project |
Authors: | Wilkinson, J Heal, C Antoniou, GA Flemyng, E Ahnstrom, L Alteri, A Avenell, A Barker, TH Borg, DN Brown, NJL Buhnamm, R Calvache, JA Carlsson, R Carter, L-A Cashin, AG Cotterill, S Farnqvist, K Ferraro, MC Grohmann, S Gurrin, LC Hayden, JA Hunter, KE Hyltse, N Jung, L Krishan, A Laporte, S Lasserson, TJ Laursen, DRT Lensen, S Li, W Li, T Liu, J Locher, C Lu, Z Lundh, A Marsden, A Meyerowitz-Katz, G Mol, BW Munn, Z Naudet, F Nunan, D O'Connell, NE Olssen, N Parker, L Patetsini, E Redman, B Rhodes, S Richardson, R Ringsten, M Rogoszinska, E Seidler, AL Sheldrick, K Stocking, K Sydenham, E Thomas, H Tsokani, S Vinatier, C Vorland, CJ Wang, R Al Wattar, BH Weber, F Weibel, S van Wely, M Xu, C Bero, L Kirkham, JJ |
Issue Date: | 9-May-2025 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Wilkinson, J. et al. (2025) 'Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 0 (in press, pre-proof), pp. 1 - 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111824. |
Abstract: | Background: The aim of the INSPECT-SR project is to develop a tool to identify problematic RCTs in systematic reviews. In Stage 1 of the project, a list of potential trustworthiness checks was created. The checks on this list must be evaluated to determine which should be included in the INSPECT-SR tool. Methods: We attempted to apply 72 trustworthiness checks to RCTs in 50 Cochrane Reviews. For each, we recorded whether the check was passed, failed or possibly failed, or whether it was not feasible to complete the check. Following application of the checks, we recorded whether we had concerns about the authenticity of each RCT. We repeated each meta-analysis after removing RCTs flagged by each check, and again after removing RCTs where we had concerns about authenticity, to estimate the impact of trustworthiness assessment. Trustworthiness assessments were compared to Risk of Bias and GRADE assessments in the reviews. Results: 95 RCTs were assessed. Following application of the checks, assessors had some or serious concerns about the authenticity of 25% and 6% of the RCTs, respectively. Removing RCTs with either some or serious concerns resulted in 22% of meta-analyses having no remaining RCTs. However, many checks proved difficult to understand or implement, which may have led to unwarranted scepticism in some instances. Furthermore, we restricted assessment to meta-analyses with no more than 5 RCTs (54% contained only 1 RCT), which will distort the impact on results. No relationship was identified between trustworthiness assessment and Risk of Bias or GRADE. Conclusions: This study supports the case for routine trustworthiness assessment in systematic reviews, as problematic studies do not appear to be flagged by Risk of Bias assessment. The study produced evidence on the feasibility and impact of trustworthiness checks. These results will be used, in conjunction with those from a subsequent Delphi process, to determine which checks should be included in the INSPECT-SR tool. |
Description: | This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31483 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111824 |
ISSN: | 0895-4356 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Jack Wilkinson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-4677 ORCiD: Calvin Heal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-1551 ORCiD: Georgios A. Antoniou https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-0406 ORCiD: Love Ahnström https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8332-958X ORCiD: Alessandra Alteri https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3092-3546 ORCiD: Alison Avenell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-5628 ORCiD: Timothy Hugh Barker https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6897-814X ORCiD: David N. Borg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0152-571X ORCiD: Nicholas J. L. Brown https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-0730 ORCiD: Rob Buhmann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-4446 ORCiD: Rickard Carlsson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6456-5735 ORCiD: Lesley-Anne Carter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-8681 ORCiD: Aidan G. Cashin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-7912 ORCiD: Kenneth Färnqvist https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-565X ORCiD: Michael C. Ferraro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-1832 ORCiD: Steph Grohmann https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5640-1688 ORCiD: Lyle C. Gurrin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-1969 ORCiD: Jill A. Hayden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-144X ORCiD; Kylie E. Hunter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-9220 ORCiD: Natalie Hyltse https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6826-6687 ORCiD: Lukas Jung https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9174-1494 ORCiD: Ashma Krishan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0702-0261 ORCiD: Silvy Laporte https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668 ORCiD: David RT. Laursen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5761-8010 ORCiD: Sarah Lensen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1694-1142 ORCiD: Clara Locher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-4351 ORCiD: Zewen Lu https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7801-049X ORCiD: Andreas Lundh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4982-8680 ORCiD: Florian Naudet https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-3801 ORCiD: David Nunan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-1276 ORCiD: Neil E. O’Connell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-4537 ORCiD: Lisa Parker https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8635-6953 ORCiD: Eleftheria Patetsini https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-982X ORCiD: Barbara Redman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-9898 ORCiD: Sarah Rhodes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5837-801X ORCiD: Rachel Richardson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-6260 ORCiD: Martin Ringsten https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-9760 ORCiD: Ewelina Rogozińska https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-0644 ORCiD: Emma Sydenham https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4237 ORCiD: Sofia Tsokani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-8861 ORCiD: Constant Vinatier https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-1838 ORCiD: Colby J. Vorland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-372X ORCiD: Bassel H. Al Wattar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-9271 ORCiD: Stephanie Weibel https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-2535 ORCiD: Madelon van Wely https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-213X ORCiD: Jamie J. Kirkham https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-9325 Article number: 111824 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | 1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License