Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31483
Title: Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project
Authors: Wilkinson, J
Heal, C
Antoniou, GA
Flemyng, E
Ahnstrom, L
Alteri, A
Avenell, A
Barker, TH
Borg, DN
Brown, NJL
Buhnamm, R
Calvache, JA
Carlsson, R
Carter, L-A
Cashin, AG
Cotterill, S
Farnqvist, K
Ferraro, MC
Grohmann, S
Gurrin, LC
Hayden, JA
Hunter, KE
Hyltse, N
Jung, L
Krishan, A
Laporte, S
Lasserson, TJ
Laursen, DRT
Lensen, S
Li, W
Li, T
Liu, J
Locher, C
Lu, Z
Lundh, A
Marsden, A
Meyerowitz-Katz, G
Mol, BW
Munn, Z
Naudet, F
Nunan, D
O'Connell, NE
Olssen, N
Parker, L
Patetsini, E
Redman, B
Rhodes, S
Richardson, R
Ringsten, M
Rogoszinska, E
Seidler, AL
Sheldrick, K
Stocking, K
Sydenham, E
Thomas, H
Tsokani, S
Vinatier, C
Vorland, CJ
Wang, R
Al Wattar, BH
Weber, F
Weibel, S
van Wely, M
Xu, C
Bero, L
Kirkham, JJ
Issue Date: 9-May-2025
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Wilkinson, J. et al. (2025) 'Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 0 (in press, pre-proof), pp. 1 - 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111824.
Abstract: Background: The aim of the INSPECT-SR project is to develop a tool to identify problematic RCTs in systematic reviews. In Stage 1 of the project, a list of potential trustworthiness checks was created. The checks on this list must be evaluated to determine which should be included in the INSPECT-SR tool. Methods: We attempted to apply 72 trustworthiness checks to RCTs in 50 Cochrane Reviews. For each, we recorded whether the check was passed, failed or possibly failed, or whether it was not feasible to complete the check. Following application of the checks, we recorded whether we had concerns about the authenticity of each RCT. We repeated each meta-analysis after removing RCTs flagged by each check, and again after removing RCTs where we had concerns about authenticity, to estimate the impact of trustworthiness assessment. Trustworthiness assessments were compared to Risk of Bias and GRADE assessments in the reviews. Results: 95 RCTs were assessed. Following application of the checks, assessors had some or serious concerns about the authenticity of 25% and 6% of the RCTs, respectively. Removing RCTs with either some or serious concerns resulted in 22% of meta-analyses having no remaining RCTs. However, many checks proved difficult to understand or implement, which may have led to unwarranted scepticism in some instances. Furthermore, we restricted assessment to meta-analyses with no more than 5 RCTs (54% contained only 1 RCT), which will distort the impact on results. No relationship was identified between trustworthiness assessment and Risk of Bias or GRADE. Conclusions: This study supports the case for routine trustworthiness assessment in systematic reviews, as problematic studies do not appear to be flagged by Risk of Bias assessment. The study produced evidence on the feasibility and impact of trustworthiness checks. These results will be used, in conjunction with those from a subsequent Delphi process, to determine which checks should be included in the INSPECT-SR tool.
Description: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31483
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111824
ISSN: 0895-4356
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Jack Wilkinson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-4677
ORCiD: Calvin Heal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-1551
ORCiD: Georgios A. Antoniou https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-0406
ORCiD: Love Ahnström https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8332-958X
ORCiD: Alessandra Alteri https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3092-3546
ORCiD: Alison Avenell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-5628
ORCiD: Timothy Hugh Barker https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6897-814X
ORCiD: David N. Borg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0152-571X
ORCiD: Nicholas J. L. Brown https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-0730
ORCiD: Rob Buhmann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-4446
ORCiD: Rickard Carlsson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6456-5735
ORCiD: Lesley-Anne Carter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-8681
ORCiD: Aidan G. Cashin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-7912
ORCiD: Kenneth Färnqvist https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-565X
ORCiD: Michael C. Ferraro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-1832
ORCiD: Steph Grohmann https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5640-1688
ORCiD: Lyle C. Gurrin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-1969
ORCiD: Jill A. Hayden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-144X
ORCiD; Kylie E. Hunter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-9220
ORCiD: Natalie Hyltse https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6826-6687
ORCiD: Lukas Jung https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9174-1494
ORCiD: Ashma Krishan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0702-0261
ORCiD: Silvy Laporte https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668
ORCiD: David RT. Laursen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5761-8010
ORCiD: Sarah Lensen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1694-1142
ORCiD: Clara Locher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-4351
ORCiD: Zewen Lu https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7801-049X
ORCiD: Andreas Lundh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4982-8680
ORCiD: Florian Naudet https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-3801
ORCiD: David Nunan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-1276
ORCiD: Neil E. O’Connell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-4537
ORCiD: Lisa Parker https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8635-6953
ORCiD: Eleftheria Patetsini https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-982X
ORCiD: Barbara Redman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-9898
ORCiD: Sarah Rhodes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5837-801X
ORCiD: Rachel Richardson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-6260
ORCiD: Martin Ringsten https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-9760
ORCiD: Ewelina Rogozińska https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-0644
ORCiD: Emma Sydenham https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4237
ORCiD: Sofia Tsokani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-8861
ORCiD: Constant Vinatier https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-1838
ORCiD: Colby J. Vorland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-372X
ORCiD: Bassel H. Al Wattar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-9271
ORCiD: Stephanie Weibel https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-2535
ORCiD: Madelon van Wely https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-213X
ORCiD: Jamie J. Kirkham https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-9325
Article number: 111824
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons