Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31486
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWebb, KL-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Alonso, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T16:21:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T16:21:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-22-
dc.identifierORCiD: Kevin L. Webb https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-6076-
dc.identifierORCiD: José González-Alonso https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-3311-
dc.identifier.citationWebb, K.L. and González-Alonso,J. (2024) 'Heat and carbon monoxide exposure: Is two better than one?', Experimental Physiology, 109 (10), pp. 1627 - 1628. doi: 10.1113/EP092198.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0958-0670-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31486-
dc.descriptionEditorial viewpoint.-
dc.description.abstractA fundamental aim in the field of human physiology is to understand and delineate the limits of human function. In the realm of exercise physiology, sports and aerobic performance, the preceding decades have been marked by investigation into exogenous mechanisms of blood doping, exemplified by the administration of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO), erythropoiesis stimulating agents and whole blood transfusion. Yet, the line between such ‘artificial’ methods of blood doping and natural adaptation becomes blurred as we better understand how to manipulate haematological parameters through methodologies currently allowed by international sporting committees.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe presented work was performed in absence of external funding.en_US
dc.format.extent1627 - 1628-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWiley on behalf of The Physiological Societyen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectaerobic performanceen_US
dc.subjecterythropoietinen_US
dc.subjectheat acclimationen_US
dc.subjectrenal oxygenationen_US
dc.titleHeat and carbon monoxide exposure: Is two better than one?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-08-08-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1113/EP092198-
dc.relation.isPartOfExperimental Physiology-
pubs.issue10-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume109-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-445X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-08-08-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.207.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons