Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31554
Title: | Robotic Systems for Cochlear Implant Surgeries: A Review of Robotic Design and Clinical Outcomes |
Authors: | Ahmed, O Wang, M Zhang, B Irving, R Begg, P Du, X |
Keywords: | cochlear implant;electrode array insertion tools;guided system;integrated robots;robotic drilling |
Issue Date: | 2-Jul-2025 |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Citation: | Ahmed, O. et al. (2025) 'Robotic Systems for Cochlear Implant Surgeries: A Review of Robotic Design and Clinical Outcomes', Electronics, 14 (13), 2685, pp. 1 - 27. doi: 10.3390/electronics14132685. |
Abstract: | Sensorineural hearing loss occurs when cochlear hair cells fail to convert mechanical sound waves into electrical signals transmitted via the auditory nerve. Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by directly stimulating the auditory nerve with electrical impulses, often while preserving residual hearing. Over the past two decades, robotic-assisted techniques in otologic surgery have gained prominence for improving precision and safety. Robotic systems support critical procedures such as mastoidectomy, cochleostomy drilling, and electrode array (EA) insertion. These technologies aim to minimize trauma and enhance hearing preservation. Despite the outpatient nature of most CI surgeries, surgeons still face challenges, including anatomical complexity, imaging demands, and rising costs. Robotic systems help address these issues by streamlining workflows, reducing variability, and improving electrode placement accuracy. This review evaluates robotic systems developed for cochlear implantation, focusing on their design, surgical integration, and clinical outcomes. This review concludes that robotic systems offer low insertion speed, which leads to reduced insertion forces and lower intracochlear pressure. However, their impact on trauma, long-term hearing preservation, and speech outcome remains uncertain. Further research is needed to assess clinical durability, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes. |
Description: | Data Availability Statement: No new data were generated or analyzed in this study; therefore, data sharing is not applicable. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31554 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14132685 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Oneeba Ahmed https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2546-7710 ORCiD: Mingfeng Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-0325 ORCiD: Bin Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-0127 ORCiD: Xinli Du https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-0804 Article number: 2685 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | 4.85 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License