Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31588
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoye, BO-
dc.contributor.authorPokhrel, S-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, KL-
dc.contributor.authorAnokye, N-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-18T13:52:00Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-18T13:52:00Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-29-
dc.identifierORCiD: Subhash Pokhrel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-8553-
dc.identifierORCiD: Kei Long Cheung https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-4556-
dc.identifierORCiD: Nana Anokye https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3615-344X-
dc.identifierArticle number: 1436098-
dc.identifier.citationBoye, B.O. et al. (2025) 'Drivers and barriers to rural and urban healthcare placement in Ghana: a Delphi study', Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1436098, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436098.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31588-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study explored the level of consensus on the drivers and barriers influencing doctors’ decisions to work in rural versus urban areas. The study provides insights into systemic issues affecting healthcare workforce distribution in Ghana. Access to medical care is particularly important given the changing demographics of Ghana, including the growth of the older and chronically ill population and the high proportion of older adults living in rural areas. Methods: A three-round e-Delphi study was conducted among doctors and regional directors of the Ghana Health Service using a seven-point Likert scale. A median score of ≥6 and an interquartile range of ≤1 was used as cutoffs. In total, 47 experts participated in the study. Although 55 initially registered interest, only 47 took part in the first round. By the second and third rounds, 42 experts remained engaged in the study. Results: Experts reached consensus on 40 descriptors (78%), of which 37 (93%) were considered important. Doctors reached consensus on 11 and 7 important drivers and barriers of rural incentive adoption, respectively, while reaching consensus on 8 important drivers of urban incentive factors. Regional directors reached consensus on 4 and 7 important drivers of rural and urban factors, respectively. Four categorical themes emerged from the analysis. These are financial, professional development and career advancement, work-life balance, and community lifestyle factors. Conclusion: The contrast in drivers and barriers between rural and urban healthcare workers necessitates tailored policy approaches, resource allocation strategies, and workforce planning efforts to ensure equitable access and quality care across diverse settings and among different sub-populations, especially the growing number of aged and chronically ill.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 12-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecte-Delphien_US
dc.subjecthealth policyen_US
dc.subjectGhanaen_US
dc.subjectdrivers and barriersen_US
dc.subjectconsensusen_US
dc.titleDrivers and barriers to rural and urban healthcare placement in Ghana: a Delphi studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-05-07-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436098-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Public Health-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume13-
dc.identifier.eissn2296-2565-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-05-07-
dc.rights.holderBoye, Pokhrel, Cheung and Anokye-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 Boye, Pokhrel, Cheung and Anokye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.318.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons