Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31977
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrater, T-
dc.contributor.authorDunford, C-
dc.contributor.authorZumaglini, S-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, F-
dc.contributor.authorGreen, D-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T18:58:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-11T18:58:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-12-
dc.identifierORCiD: Tai Frater https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-3092-
dc.identifierORCiD: Carolyn Dunford https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-4382-
dc.identifierORCiD: Silvia Zumaglini https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6043-0616-
dc.identifierORCiD: Dido Green https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-8071-
dc.identifier.citationFrater. T. (2025) 'Acceptability and feasibility of online occupational performance coaching for parents of children with disabilities in the UK', British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1177/03080226251340508.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0226-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31977-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: During the development, progress and reporting of the submitted research, Patient and Public Involvement in the research was included in planning and progress of the research.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Occupational performance coaching is a collaborative, strengths-based approach used by occupational therapists working with children and families. This study evaluates the acceptability and feasibility of delivering an online occupational performance coaching programme for parents of children with disabilities in the United Kingdom. Method: Mixed-methods feasibility study. Eight UK-based families with children with disabilities participated in four to eight online coaching sessions. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used to measure changes in occupational performance. The Parenting Stress Index Fourth Edition (short form) was used to measure changes in parental stress. Six parents were interviewed, and four therapists participated in a focus group to explore their experiences of the programme. Results: Parents and therapists reported a high level of acceptability for the telehealth coaching intervention. Parents reported positive changes in occupational performance (mean difference 3.29; p = 0.01) occupational satisfaction (mean difference 3.99; p = 0.01). Parents’ average total stress decreased by 12.5 points with greatest reductions in the parental distress subscale. Therapist fidelity to intervention was relatively low. Conclusion: The coaching programme was acceptable for parents who responded well to the intervention with noted gains in occupational performance and satisfaction. Programme delivery was feasible for therapists though further training in occupational performance coaching is recommended.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported with a grant of £9943.86 by the Elizabeth Casson Trust.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectoccupational performance coachingen_US
dc.subjectchildrenen_US
dc.subjectparentsen_US
dc.subjectparticipationen_US
dc.subjecttelehealthen_US
dc.titleAcceptability and feasibility of online occupational performance coaching for parents of children with disabilities in the UKen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-04-23-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/03080226251340508-
dc.relation.isPartOfBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy-
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-6006-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-04-23-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).455.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons