Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32081
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCocks, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, WR-
dc.contributor.authorEllmers, TJ-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-30T12:16:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-30T12:16:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-26-
dc.identifierORCiD: Adam J. Cocks https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-3827-
dc.identifierORCiD: William R. Young https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-8601-
dc.identifierORCiD: Toby J. Ellmers https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-6360-
dc.identifierArticle number: 109989-
dc.identifier.citationCocks, A.J., Young, W.R. and Ellmers, T.J. (2025) ‘Reduced cognitive resources induces risky stepping strategies in older adults’, Gait & Posture, 0 (in press, corrected proof), pp. 1 - 19. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109989.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32081-
dc.descriptionData Availability: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Falls frequently occur during situations that require a transfer or shift of bodyweight (e.g., stepping around an obstacle or turning). One contributor to falls in this scenario is a risky stepping strategy known as ‘cross-stepping’, whereby the feet cross over during the step. However, contributors to this potentially dangerous stepping strategy are not understood. This study examined whether reduced cognitive resources are a contributor to ‘cross-stepping’. Methods: Fifty-one older adults without neurological, musculoskeletal, or major cognitive impairment participated. Participants completed a modified multitarget stepping task while traversing a GAITRite walkway containing stepping targets forming paths of various colors. Participants walked designated color paths under single-task (normal walking) and a dual-task (serial subtraction) condition designed to reduce cognitive resources available for walking. The number of cross-steps and stepping errors were assessed. Cognitive performance, gait velocity, and double-limb support (% of gait cycle) were also collected. Results: During single-task conditions, measures of executive function (set-shifting)/attention (Trail Making Test–Part B) independently predicted greater cross-steps (B=0.01, p = .025). Walking under dual-task conditions significantly increased cross-steps (p = .001). Gait velocity also significantly decreased when compared to single-task, whilst global stepping errors and percentage of the gait cycle spent in double-limb support significantly increased. Significance: These findings suggest that cross-steps can result from reduced cognitive resources being allocated to movement planning and execution. Future research should seek to explore if the relationship between cognition and cross-stepping is causally linked to increased fall risk.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by an internal award from the lead institution (Brunel Research Initiative and Enterprise Fund [BRIEF] Award).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 19-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageen-
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcross-stepsen_US
dc.subjectattentionen_US
dc.subjectdual-tasken_US
dc.subjectcognitive loaden_US
dc.subjectfall-risken_US
dc.titleReduced cognitive resources induces risky stepping strategies in older adultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-09-25-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109989-
dc.relation.isPartOfGait & Posture-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2219-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-09-25-
dc.rights.holderElsevier B.V.-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 26 September 2026. Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).342.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons