Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32181
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSultana, M-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, T-
dc.contributor.authorKamal, M-
dc.contributor.authorKabir, MA-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, S-
dc.contributor.authorHuque, R-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T16:33:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-18T16:33:54Z-
dc.date.issued2025-10-07-
dc.identifierORCiD: Sayem Ahmed https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-1500-
dc.identifierArticle number: 101505-
dc.identifier.citationSultana, M. et al. (2026) 'Valuation of EQ-5D Health States for Adults in Low-, Lower-Middle, and Upper-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review', Value in Health Regional Issues, 51, 101505, pp. 1 - 10. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101505,en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-1099-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32181-
dc.descriptionData Availability: All data are publicly available and summarized within the article and supplemental files.en_US
dc.descriptionSupplemental Material is available online at: https://www.valuehealthregionalissues.com/article/S2212-1099(25)00431-5/fulltext#supplementary-material .-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life is crucial for informing resource allocation decisions, with the EQ-5D instrument widely used as a measure of health-related quality of life. Although country-specific value sets are well established in many high-income countries, current summarized evidence from valuation studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. This review systematically identified EQ-5D valuation studies in LMICs, summarized methodologies and scoring algorithms by country type, and highlighted key challenges. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken across 7 academic databases and the EuroQol website. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and performed full-text reviews and data extraction. Reporting followed Checklist Reporting Valuation Studies of Multi-Attribute Utility-Based Instruments for quality assessment. The synthesis included study characteristics, methodologies, and summarized scoring algorithms from the best-performing models, highlighting variations across countries. Results: Through screening 9378 studies, 35 studies from 22 LMICs were included. Of these, 20 (58%) were from upper-middle-income countries, whereas low-middle and low-income countries accounted for 13 (37%) and 2 (6%) studies, respectively. Eighteen (51%) studies reported EQ-5D-5L valuations. Sample sizes ranged from 148 to 5503, with the time trade-off method being predominant. Scoring algorithms showed no significant variation between upper-middle- and low-middle-income countries, except for the pain/discomfort dimension in EQ-5D-5L. Mobility was the most reported utility decrement among studies. Conclusions: There is a growing trend in developing country-specific value sets in LMICs. Contextually relevant designs and adequate pilot studies could enhance the accuracy of value sets in culturally diverse settings, particularly where severe health states are commonly reported.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMarufa Sultana’s time is supported by the Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Research Fellowship by Deakin University. No additional funding was received to conduct this research.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 10-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEngish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier on behalf of International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Researchen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectEQ-5Den_US
dc.subjecthealth statesen_US
dc.subjectLMICen_US
dc.subjectvaluationen_US
dc.titleValuation of EQ-5D Health States for Adults in Low-, Lower-Middle, and Upper-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-08-18-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101505-
dc.relation.isPartOfValue in Health Regional Issues-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume51-
dc.identifier.eissn2212-1102-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-08-18-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. User License: Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons