Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32235
Title: International expert consensus on surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors: Kermansaravi, M
Omar, I
Finer, N
Le Roux, C
Carbajo, MA
Sarwer, D
Busetto, L
Ponce, J
Logue, J
Parretti, HM
O’Kane, M
Shahabi, S
Khunti, K
Blakemore, AI
Stenberg, E
Abbott, S
Alqahtani, A
Aminian, A
Amr, B
Balibrea, JM
Batterham, RL
Behrens, E
Bhatt, DL
Chesworth, P
Chowbey, P
Clare, K
Galvao Neto, M
Graham, Y
Goel, R
Hanif, W
Herrera, MF
Kasama, K
Kassir, R
Knop, FK
Kothari, SN
Kristinsson, JA
McGowan, B
McKechnie, A
Miller, K
Miras, AD
Morton, J
Ogden, J
Peterli, R
Pinkney, JH
Pournaras, D
Pouwels, S
Prager, G
Salminen, P
Serlie, MJ
Shabbir, A
Singhal, R
Taheri, S
Tahrani, AA
Weiner, R
Shikora, SA
Mahawar, K
Keywords: metabolic surgery;bariatric surgery;type 2 diabetes mellitus
Issue Date: 1-Jul-2025
Publisher: BioMed Central (Part of Springer Nature)
Citation: Kermansaravi, M. et al. (2025) '', BMC Endocrine Disorders, 25 (1), 151, pp. 1 - 23. doi: 10.1186/s12902-025-01961-w.
Abstract: Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been an established treatment option for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but there is a relative paucity of evidence-based guidelines on preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations concerning metabolic surgery for T2DM patients. To address this gap, we initiated a Delphi consensus process with a diverse group of international multidisciplinary experts. Method: We embarked on a Delphi consensus-building exercise to propose an evidence-based expert consensus covering various aspects of MBS in patients with T2DM. We defined the scope of the exercise and proposed statements and surveyed the literature through electronic databases. The literature summary and voting process were conducted by 52 experts, who evaluated 44 statements. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: Consensus, defined as > 80% agreement, was reached for 43 out of 44 statements. The experts reached an agreement on the nature, terminology, and mechanisms of action of MBS. The currently available scores for predicting remission of T2DM after surgery are not robust enough for routine clinical use, and there is a need for further research to enable more personalized treatment. Additionally, they agreed that metabolic surgery for T2DM is cost-effective, and MBS procedures for treating T2DM vary in their safety and efficacy. Conclusion: This Delphi expert consensus statement guides clinicians on various aspects of metabolic surgery for T2DM and also grades the quality of the available evidence for each of the proposed statements.
Description: Data availability: No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32235
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01961-w
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Alexandra I. Blakemore https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-564X
Article number: 151
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons