Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32241
Title: Global sensitivity analysis of blue hydrogen production: a comparative study using machine learning
Authors: Davies, WG
Quintanilla, P
Yang, Y
Masoudi Soltani, S
Keywords: hydrogen;carbon capture;machine learning;global sensitivity analysis
Issue Date: 29-Oct-2025
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Davies, W.G. et al. (2025) 'Global sensitivity analysis of blue hydrogen production: a comparative study using machine learning', International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 190, 152153, pp. 1 - 35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152153.
Abstract: Data-driven modelling utilising machine learning (ML) techniques offers a powerful alternative to first-principles simulations of chemical processes. In this work, artificial neural networks and random forests were developed as surrogate models, trained on data from a first-principles model of sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming with chemical-looping combustion. These ML-based surrogates were integrated with global sensitivity analysis (GSA) approaches to identify key process drivers and evaluate the comparative performance of different GSA methods in chemical process modelling. The surrogate models achieved an approximately 99 % reduction in computational time compared to first-principles simulations, while maintaining predictive accuracy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the CaO/natural gas (CaO/NG) ratio is a dominant parameter, strongly influencing carbon capture efficiency and hydrogen production performance (cold-gas efficiency and H2 purity). In-situ CO2 removal from the reformer was shown to shift equilibrium towards higher hydrogen yields while simultaneously enabling CO2 capture. Ratios of CaO/NG ≥ 1.00 ensured high capture efficiency, while improvements in cold-gas efficiency were observed from ratios ≥0.5. Among GSA methods, the Sobol approach delivered high computational efficiency (0.5 s) with first- and second-order sensitivities, whereas Shapley additive explanations provided greater interpretability but at significantly higher computational cost (384 s).
Description: Data availability statement: The data generated in this work is made available at Brunel Figshare database at https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.29478566.v1.
Supplementary data are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925051560?via%3Dihub#appsec1 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32241
ISSN: 0360-3199
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: William George Davies https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-7962
ORCiD: Paulina Quintanilla https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-0556
ORCiD: Yang Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-7585
ORCiD: Salman Masoudi Soltani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5983-0397
Article number: 152153
Appears in Collections:Dept of Chemical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).24.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons