Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32458
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbrusci, E-
dc.contributor.authorda Cunha Mota, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-05T11:19:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-05T11:19:10Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifierORCiD: Elena Abrusci https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-5369-
dc.identifier.citationAbrusci, E. and da Cunha Mota, J. (2025) 'Borrowing, rephrasing, or inventing? How the African Commission and Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights have filled the gap on legitimate restrictions to freedom of expression', Human Rights Law Review, 0 (accepted, in press), pp. 1 - 24. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngaf043.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-7781-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32458-
dc.description.abstract...en_US
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectlegitimate aimsen_US
dc.subjectArticle 9 African Charter of Human and Peoples’ Rights freedom of expressionen_US
dc.subjectregional human rights systemsen_US
dc.subjecthuman rights convergenceen_US
dc.titleBorrowing, rephrasing, or inventing? How the African Commission and Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights have filled the gap on legitimate restrictions to freedom of expressionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-11-15-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf043-
dc.relation.isPartOfHuman Rights Law Review-
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1744-1021-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-11-15-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until publication414.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.