Brunel University Research Archive(BURA) preserves and enables easy and open access to all
types of digital content. It showcases Brunel's research outputs.
Research contained within BURA is open access, although some publications may be subject
to publisher imposed embargoes. All awarded PhD theses are also archived on BURA.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32458| Title: | Borrowing, rephrasing, or inventing? How the African Commission and Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights have filled the gap on legitimate restrictions to freedom of expression |
| Authors: | Abrusci, E da Cunha Mota, J |
| Keywords: | legitimate aims;Article 9 African Charter of Human and Peoples’ Rights freedom of expression;regional human rights systems;human rights convergence |
| Issue Date: | 2025 |
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
| Citation: | Abrusci, E. and da Cunha Mota, J. (2025) 'Borrowing, rephrasing, or inventing? How the African Commission and Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights have filled the gap on legitimate restrictions to freedom of expression', Human Rights Law Review, 0 (accepted, in press), pp. 1 - 24. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngaf043. |
| Abstract: | ... |
| URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32458 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf043 |
| ISSN: | 1461-7781 |
| Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Elena Abrusci https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-5369 |
| Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Embargoed Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Embargoed until publication | 414.9 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.