Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32515
Title: Self-reported poliomyelitis vaccination and documentation in adults indicates high uptake: a digital German epidemic panel, December 2024
Authors: Kettlitz, R
Harries, M
Contreras, S
Reinecke, J
Wieder, MS
von Lengerke, T
Castell, S
Lange, B
Klett-Tammen, CJ
Melhorn, V
Schulze, DA
Helmholtz, FJ
Rodiah, I
Shomali, K
Montresor, G
Leardini, C
Landi, S
Bucciol, A
Nicodemo, C
Garcia-Guerrero, MC
Puertas, MC
Morón-López, S
Fernández-Rosas, E
Martinez-Picado, J
De Groote, R
Van Hileghem, L
Spasic, D
Lammertyn, J
Ma, Z
Fritz, G
Bayoumi, MMA
Kayahan, E
Solvas, XCI
Ziemons, GRM
Klopp, N
Illig, T
Kern, WV
Kappert, O
Tonn, T
Gubbe, K
Frank, K
Bojara, G
Kerrinnes, T
Schlüter, M
Gornyk, D
Hernandez, P
Krause, G
Heise, JK
Schneiderhan-Marra, N
Dulovic, A
Strengert, M
PCR-4-ALL study group
MuSPAD study group
Keywords: digital epidemiology;vaccination uptake;population immunity;vaccination records;infectious diseases;poliomyelitis
Issue Date: 16-Oct-2025
Publisher: BioMed Central (Springer Nature)
Citation: Kettlitz, R. et al. on behalf of the PCR-4-ALL study group & MuSPAD study group (2025) 'Self-reported poliomyelitis vaccination and documentation in adults indicates high uptake: a digital German epidemic panel, December 2024', BMC Public Health, 25 (1), 3514, pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24865-9.
Abstract: Background: On 12 December 2024, the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) recommended universal polio catch-up vaccination for children and adolescents up to 16, urging parents to check their children’s immunization status following detections of vaccine-derived poliovirus in wastewater. The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) also advised healthcare professionals to ensure vaccination coverage in priority groups. Regional health authorities, called on all citizens to review their vaccination records to address any immunization gaps. We investigated vaccine uptake (documented / recalled) to improve estimates of immunity against poliovirus among the German population and gain insights into the proportion of undocumented vaccines. Methods: We conducted a survey in December 2024 using the eResearch System PIA (Prospective Monitoring and Management—App) to collect data on self-reported vaccine uptake among a German cohort. We calculated the frequency of vaccinations that were documented and undocumented, as well as the types of vaccines and the number of doses received. Vaccination status was classified as received ≤ 2 doses versus ≥ 3 doses of any polio-containing vaccine. We applied survey weights to calculate frequencies according the general German population (by age, sex, region) and logistic regression to examine the relationships between the vaccinations that were not documented but recalled, and the factors associated with these undocumented vaccinations. Results: Among 1,124 participants who completed the survey on vaccination uptake, 1,097 (96.9%) participants stated to have a vaccination record. A total of 823/1,124 (74.3%) reported having a vaccination record, where at least one poliomyelitis vaccine was documented, whereas 233 (19.0%) participants recalled at least one poliomyelitis vaccination without documentation or vaccination record. Of 1,124, 68 participants (6.7%) did not report any polio vaccination neither documented nor recalled without documentation. Among the 823 participants with documented vaccination and at least one vaccination, 592 (75.1%) received at least three doses of a poliomyelitis vaccine, with a decline in older age groups, less than three doses were reported by 164 (17.6%), and the remaining 7.3% (n = 67) did not have information on the number of doses administered. Of 2,768 documented vaccine doses, 898 (29.9%) were oral poliovirus vaccines (OPV) and 704 (26.2%) were inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV). In 1,166 vaccines (43.9%), the type could not be derived by the participants from the vaccination record. The odds of having a recalled vaccination (not documented) was higher in male and the older age groups compared to females and younger participants. Discussion: We found similar poliomyelitis vaccination uptake compared to other data sources e.g., of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). Vaccine-derived immunity to poliomyelitis may be underestimated based on vaccination records only. There is a need to address potential gaps in health literacy and vaccination documentation. Efforts should be made to conduct continuous seroprevalence surveys in the population in response to emerging public health threats and deduce parameters to inform modelling infection dynamics in specific outbreak scenarios. Trial registration: The PCR-4-ALL cohort was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on the 3rd of September 2024 (DRKS00034763).
Description: Data availability: Aggregated data is presented in the figures and tables of the manuscript. Due to data protection concerns, access to the individual-level data is restricted. Upon request anonymized data can be provided. Please contact the authors if you have any questions or require further information.
Consortia: PCR-4-ALL study group: Xavier Casadevall i Solvas, Emine Kayahan, Mariam Mohamed Abdelsatta Bayoumi, Gregor Fritz, Zhiyuan Ma, Jeroen Lammertyn, Dragana Spasic, Lorenz Van Hileghem, Robin De Groote, Javier Martinez-Picado, Elisabet Fernández-Rosas, Sara Morón-López, Maria C. Puertas, Maria C. Garcia-Guerrero, Catia Nicodemo, Alessandro Bucciol, Stefano Landi, Chiara Leardini, Giulia Montresor, Khalidwa Shomali, Isti Rodiah, Felix Jenniches Helmholtz, Daniel Alexander Schulze & Vanessa Melhorn. MuSPAD study group: Monika Strengert, Alex Dulovic, Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra, Jana-Kristin Heise, Gérard Krause, Pilar Hernandez, Daniela Gornyk, Monike Schlüter, Tobias Kerrinnes, Gerhard Bojara, Kerstin Frank, Knut Gubbe, Torsten Tonn, Oliver Kappert, Winfried V. Kern, Thomas Illig, Norman Klopp & Gottfried Roller Michael Ziemons.
Supplementary Information is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-025-24865-9#Sec16 .
Use of artificial intelligence tools: We used OpenAI's ChatGPT v2 to review and refine the R code for improved structure and functionality. For clarity and precision, the English language parts of this manuscript have been edited using DeepL Pro. The authors checked the output for correctness and take responsibility for it.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32515
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24865-9
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Catia Nicodemo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-9576
Article number: 3514
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons