Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32727
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaltrocchi, APD-
dc.contributor.authorShafique, M-
dc.contributor.authorTorretta, V-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-26T11:03:49Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-26T11:03:49Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-12-
dc.identifierORCiD: Alberto Pietro Damiano Baltrocchi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8822-5866-
dc.identifierORCiD: Muhammad Shafique https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1581-6980-
dc.identifierArticle number: 100168-
dc.identifier.citationBaltrocchi, A.P.D., Shafique, M. and Torretta, V. (2026) 'A Systematic Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Prefabricated Buildings', Sustainable Horizons, 17, 100168, pp. 1 - 17. doi: 10.1016/j.horiz.2025.100168.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32727-
dc.descriptionData availability: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.en_US
dc.descriptionSupplementary materials are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737825000380?via%3Dihub#sec0032 .-
dc.description.abstractThe construction sector has a significant impact on the environment, highlighting the need for sustainable building practices to decrease the emissions and propose alternative construction solutions. In this framework, prefabricated construction methods offer a promising solution, providing benefits such as reduced material waste, improved energy efficiency, and alignment with net-zero principles. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach represents a key tool for evaluating the environmental performance of buildings throughout their entire life cycle, enabling a direct comparison between prefabricated and traditional construction methods. This systematic review examines the application of LCA methodologies to assess the environmental impacts of modular and prefabricated buildings. By analysing recent peer-reviewed articles, this study investigates the use of key LCA elements, including software, databases, System Boundaries, Functional Unit, and environmental impact categories. The impact categories analysis indicates that, in terms of global warming potential, 1 m² of structure impacts an average of 325, 327, and 389 kg CO₂ eq for steel, wood, and concrete, respectively, for phases A and C. Furthermore, this review highlights and discusses the main limitations and the research gaps of the current studies of LCA methodology applied to modular construction, emphasising the need to intervene on five potential improvement areas: (i) methodological development, (ii) policy implications, (iii) stakeholder engagement and awareness, (iv) digital tools and innovation and (v) Circular Economy (CE) integration.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received no external funding.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 17-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier on behalf of Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningboen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectmodular buildingsen_US
dc.subjectprefabricated constructionen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental impactsen_US
dc.titleA Systematic Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Prefabricated Buildingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2025.100168-
dc.relation.isPartOfSustainable Horizons-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume17-
dc.identifier.eissn2772-7378-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidBaltrocchi, Alberto Pietro Damiano [0000-0002-8822-5866]-
dc.contributor.orcidShafique, Muhammad [0000-0002-1581-6980]-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo. This is an Open Access article under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).3.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons