Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32753
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdnan, MSG-
dc.contributor.authorKebede, AS-
dc.contributor.authorAppeaning Addo, K-
dc.contributor.authorDewan, A-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, T-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, C-
dc.contributor.authorWard, PJ-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-28T16:20:36Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-28T16:20:36Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-26-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani Adnan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-1891-
dc.identifierORCiD: Abiy S. Kebede https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7844-1151-
dc.identifier.citationAdnan, M.S.G. et al. (2026) 'Towards nature-positive engineering: nature-based solutions in attenuating coastal hydrometeorological hazards', Environmental Research Letters, 0 (in press, pre-proof), pp. 1 - 30. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ae3d4d.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32753-
dc.description.abstractCoastal and deltaic regions are highly vulnerable to hydrometeorological hazards such as storms, flooding, and extreme temperatures—risks that are intensifying under climate change. While hard engineering structures (e.g., levees, seawalls) remain widely used, they can be costly, ecologically disruptive, and may exacerbate hazard complexity. Nature-based solutions (NbS), including mangroves, salt marshes, and other coastal ecosystems, offer sustainable and often cost-effective alternatives or complementarities that can mitigate hazards while delivering ecological and societal co-benefits. However, their effectiveness is difficult to assess due to diverse methodological approaches, site-specific coastal dynamics, and inconsistent reporting indicators. This study synthesises the scientific evidence base on the effectiveness of NbS in reducing hydrometeorological hazards in coastal and deltaic environments and evaluates the robustness of methods used to assess their performance. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 383 peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2008 and 2024 was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocols and the PICO framework. Using an evaluation approach adapted from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, each study was assessed for evidence robustness, level of agreement, and overall confidence. The meta-analysis provides quantitative estimates of NbS effectiveness and highlights substantial uncertainties arising from ecological variability, methodological inconsistencies, and heterogeneity in hazard indicators (e.g., wave height, flow velocity, water level, temperature) and measurement units. Findings show that NbS effectiveness is highly context dependent and influenced by site characteristics, ecological dimensions, system configuration, and hazard intensity. The study emphasises the need for standardised, hazard-specific indicators and greater use of integrated methodological approaches to strengthen the reliability and comparability of future assessments. It also identifies opportunities for advancing hybrid or nature-positive engineering solutions that combine NbS with conventional infrastructure to enhance coastal resilience.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Leverhulme Trust through an Early Career Fellowship awarded to MSGA [grant reference ECF-2023-074]. ASK acknowledges support from the IUCN Global EbA Fund through the project ‘Upscaling Mangrove Restoration for Coastal Hazard Reduction in a Deltaic Environment: Prioritizing Restoration Efforts for Nature-based Solutions in the Volta Delta’. CJW acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe programme under the project ‘Multi-hazard and risk informed system for enhanced local and regional disaster risk management (MEDiate)’ project [grant agreement No. 101074075].en_US
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectnature-based solutionsen_US
dc.subjectperformance evaluationen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectlevel of confidenceen_US
dc.subjectnature-positive engineeringen_US
dc.titleTowards nature-positive engineering: nature-based solutions in attenuating coastal hydrometeorological hazardsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-01-26-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae3d4d-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnvironmental Research Letters-
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1748-9326-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-01-26-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidAdnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani [0000-0002-7276-1891]-
dc.contributor.orcidKebede, Abiy S. [0000-0002-7844-1151]-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). As the Version of Record of this article is going to be / has been published on a gold open access basis under a CC BY 4.0 licence, this Accepted Manuscript is available for reuse under a CC BY 4.0 licence immediately. Everyone is permitted to use all or part of the original content in this article, provided that they adhere to all the terms of the licence https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 Although reasonable endeavours have been taken to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version. Before using any content from this article, please refer to the Version of Record on IOPscience once published for full citation and copyright details, as permissions may be required. All third party content is fully copyright protected and is not published on a gold open access basis under a CC BY licence, unless that is specifically stated in the figure caption in the Version of Record.1.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons