Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32817
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, AA-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-17T10:35:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-17T10:35:56Z-
dc.date.issued2026-02-16-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ali J. Ali https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8359-7787-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ashraf A. Ahmed https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6734-1622-
dc.identifier.citationAli, A.J. and Ahmed, A.A. (2026) 'Advancing river water quality prediction: a comparative assessment of deep learning models for dissolved oxygen forecasting', International Journal of River Basin Management, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2026.2626322.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1571-5124-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32817-
dc.description.abstractAccurate forecasting of dissolved oxygen (DO) is crucial for monitoring river water quality and protecting aquatic ecosystems. This study compares the performance of four deep learning models – Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT), Informer, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) – for forecasting DO concentrations in the River Lee (London, UK) across 7- and 30-day time frames. A multivariate time-series dataset was employed, with temperature, turbidity, pH, conductivity, chlorophyll, and river flow as predictors. Model skills were evaluated using RMSE, MAE, R2, and SMAPE. Over the 7-day period, TFT had the lowest RMSE (0.06) and SMAPE (8.86%), while LSTM had the greatest R2 (0.77). TFT outperformed Informer, LSTM, and GRU at the 30-day horizon, with R2 = 0.79 and SMAPE of 8.23%, despite significant accuracy losses. According to the variable contribution study, temperature and river flow were the most significant factors, particularly for short-term projections. Overall, the results show that transformer-based structures, particularly TFT, can successfully represent nonlinear temporal dependencies and multivariate interactions, making them ideal for multi-horizon DO forecasting in river systems. These models have the ability to supplement normal monitoring by offering short-term predictions about probable oxygen conditions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study is partially funded by the UK Research and Innovation UKRI project 10063665.en_US
dc.format.extent1–22-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecthydrological time seriesen_US
dc.subjectriver streamflowen_US
dc.subjecthydrological time seriesen_US
dc.subjectRiver Leeen_US
dc.subjectUKen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental monitoringen_US
dc.subjectmulti-horizon predictionen_US
dc.subjectmachine learning in water resourcesen_US
dc.titleAdvancing river water quality prediction: a comparative assessment of deep learning models for dissolved oxygen forecastingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-01-30-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2026.2626322-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of River Basin Management-
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1814-2060-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/leghalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-01-30-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidAli, Ali J. [0009-0007-8359-7787]-
dc.contributor.orcidAhmed, Ashraf A. [0000-0002-6734-1622]-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.3.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons