Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, TC-
dc.coverage.spatial47en
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-08T15:40:47Z-
dc.date.available2009-05-08T15:40:47Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Social and Personal Relationships. 25 (1) 143-168en
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1177/0265407507086810-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3290-
dc.description.abstractTwo studies examined emotional intimacy in European Canadian and Chinese Canadian dating relationships. Cultural differences in gender-role ideology and individualism–collectivism were hypothesized to differentially contribute to selfdisclosure and responsiveness, and in turn, intimacy. Study 1 revealed that Chinese Canadians’ lower intimacy relative to European Canadians was mediated by their greater gender-role traditionalism but not by their individualism or collectivism. Study 2 further linked greater gender-role traditionalism to lower self-disclosure, and in turn, lower intimacy. Results also revealed that Chinese Canadians’ lower intimacy mediated their lower relationship satisfaction and higher rate of relationship termination in Study 1, but that Chinese Canadians were not any more likely to terminate their relationships in Study 2.en
dc.format.extent331614 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSage-
dc.subjectChineseen
dc.subjectcultureen
dc.subjectdatingen
dc.subjectintimacyen
dc.subjectgender rolesen
dc.subjectrelationshipsen
dc.titleCultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism-collectivismen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Psychology
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cultural Differences in Intimacy.pdf323.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.