Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33321Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Jenkins, Timothy O. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Polkey, Michael I. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | McWilliams, David | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kilbride, Cherry | - |
| dc.contributor.author | MacBean, Vicky | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-19T15:03:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-19T15:03:27Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-06-24 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCiD: Cherry Kilbride https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-1883 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCiD: Vicky MacBean https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-2693 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Jenkins, T.O. et al. (2026) 'Defining a diaphragm-focused and patient-acceptable inspiratory muscle training (IMT) load in difficult to wean, mechanically ventilated patients: a protocol for a prospective, mixed methods study', BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 13, e004168, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004168. | en-GB |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33321 | - |
| dc.description | Data availability statement: Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. | en-GB |
| dc.description | Supplementary files are available online at: https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/13/1/e004168#supplementary-materials . | en-GB |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Diaphragm dysfunction is associated with failure to wean from mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) may help improve outcomes for difficult-to-wean patients, yet the optimal approach remains unknown. High load IMT causes a training effect on the extra-diaphragmatic inspiratory muscles, but does not improve weaning success, questioning the utility of frequently cited high intensity IMT loads. Additionally, patients may find IMT unpleasant and distressing due to dyspnoea experienced during IMT. The aim of this study is to define a diaphragm-focused IMT load which is acceptable to patients. Methods: This study is designed as a prospective, mixed methods study. Forty difficult to wean, tracheostomised patients on mechanical ventilation will perform IMT at 15, 30, 45 and 60% of their maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) in a randomised order using a tapered flow resistive loading device (POWERBreathe KH2, POWERBreathe, UK). Electrical activity of the diaphragm will be measured using an oesophageal multipair catheter (NAVA, Getinge, Sweden); extra-diaphragmatic (parasternal, scalene and sternocleidomastoid) muscle activity will be measured using surface electromyography. Patient experience of each load will be explored by measuring perceived breathing difficulty and unpleasantness using 0–10 numeric rating scales, verbal or written communication techniques in line with the participants' communication ability, and/or bespoke communication boards co-designed with the study patient and public involvement (PPI) group. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated to inform a diaphragm-focused, patient-acceptable IMT load. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from Wales Research Ethics Committee 4 (Reference 25/WA/0242) on 30 October 2025. Results from this study will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number: NCT07256821. | en-GB |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study is funded by an NIHR Doctoral Clinical and Practitioner Academic Fellowship (DCAF), grant number NIHR305214, awarded to Timothy Jenkins to undertake a PhD. The study protocol underwent an independent peer review process before being awarded | en-GB |
| dc.format.extent | pp. 1–7 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Electronic | - |
| dc.language | English | en-GB |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en-GB |
| dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group on behalf of the British Thoracic Society | en-GB |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
| dc.title | Defining a diaphragm-focused and patient-acceptable inspiratory muscle training (IMT) load in difficult to wean, mechanically ventilated patients: a protocol for a prospective, mixed methods study | en-GB |
| dc.type | Article | en-GB |
| dc.date.dateAccepted | 2026-05-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004168 | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | BMJ Open Respiratory Research | en-GB |
| pubs.publication-status | Published online | - |
| pubs.volume | 13 | - |
| dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en | - |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2026-05-08 | - |
| dcterms.description | What is already known on this topic: • Previous work evaluating inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in mechanically ventilated patients has shown variable effects on strength and clinical outcomes, with training regimes often lacking a clear physiological basis and studies disregarding the patient experience. What this study adds: • This prospective, mixed methods study will examine the electrical activity of the diaphragm and selected extra-diaphragmatic muscles during four IMT intensities. Patient experience of IMT will be explored contemporaneously using a bespoke range of communication approaches. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: • Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated to determine an IMT load that focuses on diaphragm activation and is psychologically acceptable to patients. • The results of this study will be used to inform the design of a feasibility randomised controlled trial. | en-GB |
| dc.rights.holder | Author(s) (or their employer(s)) | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Jenkins, Timothy O. [0000-0002-8631-0725] | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Kilbride, Cherry [0000-0002-2045-1883] | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | MacBean, Vicky [0000-0003-0268-2693] | - |
| dc.identifier.number | e004168 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Health Sciences Research Papers | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by BMJ Group. | 347.18 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License