Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33373| Title: | Socioeconomic inequity in extreme outcomes within very pre-term and/or very low birthweight infants: evidence from multi-national cohorts |
| Authors: | Pilvar, H Nicodemo, C Petrou, S Darlow, BA van Dommelen, P Evensen, KAI Harris, S Horwood, J Johnson, S Marlow, N Mathewson, K Saigal, S Schmidt, LA Wolke, D Woodward, LJ Kim, S |
| Keywords: | concentration index;horizontal inequity;inequality;RECAP Pre-term Project;very low birth weight;very pre-term |
| Issue Date: | 23-Apr-2026 |
| Publisher: | Frontiers Media |
| Citation: | Pilvar, H. et al. (2026) 'Socioeconomic inequity in extreme outcomes within very pre-term and/or very low birthweight infants: evidence from multi-national cohorts', Frontiers in Public Health, 14, 1791450, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1791450. |
| Abstract: | Background: Pre-term birth (<37 weeks’ gestation) is a major cause of neonatal mortality, with very pre-term (<32 weeks’ gestation) and extremely pre-term (<28 weeks’ gestation) infants facing the highest risks. While socioeconomic disparities in pre-term birth are well-documented, relatively little is known about inequities among the highest risk subgroups. Methods: Using data from the RECAP Pre-term Project across six high-income countries, we analyzed socioeconomic inequality in the incidence of extreme pre-term birth (EP) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) among very pre-term/very low birth weight (VP/VLBW) infants. We measured inequality using concentration indices across cohorts and two adjusted measures of horizontal inequity (HI1 and HI2), to estimate the contributions of socioeconomic factors (e.g., parental education, ethnicity) to the outcomes. Results: Results showed that the incidence of EP in the Netherlands (HI2 = 0.171) and Norway (HI2 = 0.210) was higher among more socioeconomically advantaged infants born at VP/VLBW, but higher among more socioeconomically disadvantaged infants in New Zealand (HI2 = −0.020). Incidence of ELBW was higher among disadvantaged infants in Germany (HI2 = −0.046). Parental education was the strongest driver of these effects, though ethnicity and socioeconomic status moderated these effects. Conclusions: Counterintuitively, EP/ELBW were concentrated among advantaged groups in some countries, possibly reflecting survival bias or unequal access to neonatal care. The study highlights the need for targeted policies addressing inequities within high-risk pre-term populations and underscores methodological challenges in assessing disparities among vulnerable subgroups. |
| Description: | Data availability statement:
The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: the data supporting the results reported in this article are available upon request from the RECAP Pre-term Project and the individual data holders. Due to privacy restrictions, individual-level data cannot be shared publicly. For access to the data, researchers may contact the RECAP Pre-term Project at https://recap-pre-term.eu to request the minimal dataset necessary for replicating and building upon the findings reported in this study. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to https://recap-pre-term.eu. Supplementary material: The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1791450/full#supplementary-material . |
| URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33373 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1791450 |
| Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Catia Nicodemo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-9576 |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management Research Papers * |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2026 Pilvar, Nicodemo, Petrou, Darlow, van Dommelen, Evensen, Harris, Horwood, Johnson, Marlow, Mathewson, Saigal, Schmidt, Wolke, Woodward and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | 480.3 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License