Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33526
Title: The economic burden of COVID-19 undervaccination: costs of hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death in Scotland
Authors: Kerr, S
Madia, JE
Nicodemo, C
Sheikh, A
Issue Date: 21-Apr-2026
Publisher: BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature)
Citation: Kerr, S. et al. (2026) 'The economic burden of COVID-19 undervaccination: costs of hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death in Scotland', Health Economics Review, 16 (1), 69, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13561-026-00775-3.
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed substantial financial and operational pressures on healthcare systems globally. While vaccines were known to reduce severe outcomes, their broader economic impacts, especially in publicly funded health systems, requires clearer quantification. This study evaluates the direct healthcare costs associated with COVID-19 outcomes in relation to vaccination status, using linked individual-level data from Scotland’s EAVE II cohort (June to September 2022). We defined undervaccination as the shortfall between recommended and received COVID-19 vaccine doses, stratified by age group. Retrospective cohort analysis employing Cox proportional hazards and linear regression models was used to assess the associations between undervaccination and the risk, frequency, and duration of hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. We also conducted a counterfactual analysis to estimate averted costs and quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs) under a full vaccination scenario. Findings demonstrate a strong dose–response relationship between undervaccination and severe COVID-19 outcomes. Among individuals aged 75+, those with higher undervaccination levels showed significantly increased hazard ratios for hospitalisation (up to 3.92 for sub-optimal level 2), ICU admission (up to 12.53 for sub-optimal level 2), and mortality (up to 6.63 for sub-optimal level 3). These elevated risks translated into substantial direct healthcare costs. Hospitalisation costs reached £4.7 million for the 75+ group and £2.6 million for the 16–74 group, while ICU costs totalled £70,489 and £246,486, respectively. Under a counterfactual full vaccination scenario, potentially avertable hospital costs were estimated at £1.4 million for the 75+ group and £0.5 million for the 16–74 group. Vaccination rates were lower among younger individuals, ethnic minorities, and residents in more deprived areas, highlighting persistent health inequalities. Of the total cohort of 4,992,498 individuals, 65.8% were fully vaccinated on 1 June 2022, while 34.2% were undervaccinated. These inequalities were not only clinically consequential but also economically costly: undervaccinated individuals generated more than five-fold the COVID-19 healthcare spend of their fully vaccinated peers. Universal full vaccination could have averted approximately £1.4 million (75+) and £0.5 million (16–74) in hospital costs, and a further £38,000 in ICU costs, during summer 2022.
Description: Data availability: The data utilized in this study consist of sensitive, individual-level, linked health records from the Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II) platform in Scotland. Due to the highly confidential nature of these data and to protect patient privacy, they are not publicly available. Access to the EAVE II platform is strictly controlled and granted only to approved researchers operating within secure trusted research environments in accordance with stringent ethical and data governance protocols. Researchers interested in accessing similar data for future studies may submit a formal application to Public Health Scotland, following their established data access procedures and subject to ethical approval. This ensures adherence to national guidelines for the use of health data for research purposes.
Supplementary Information is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-026-00775-3#Sec17 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33526
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-026-00775-3
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Catia Nicodemo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-9576
Appears in Collections:Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2026. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons