Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33533
Title: Toward Sustainable 3D Concrete Printing: A Critical Review of Waste-Derived Materials Across Binder, Geopolymer, and Aggregate Systems
Authors: Kamel, KT
Shamass, R
Lin, Y-Y
Jin, R
Keywords: 3D concrete printing;waste materials;sustainable construction;geopolymer binders;cement replacement
Issue Date: 22-Jun-2026
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Kamel, K.T. et al. (2026) 'Toward Sustainable 3D Concrete Printing: A Critical Review of Waste-Derived Materials Across Binder, Geopolymer, and Aggregate Systems', Applied Sciences, 16 (12), 6258, pp. 1–34. doi: 10.3390/app16126258.
Abstract: Three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) has emerged as a promising digital construction technology that reduces material waste, eliminates formwork, and enables complex geometries. However, its sustainability remains constrained by the extensive use of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and natural aggregates. This review comprehensively evaluates waste utilization in extrusion-based 3D printed concrete, classifying applications into three pathways: cement replacement in OPC-based systems, waste-derived precursors in alkali-activated/geopolymer binders, and fine aggregate replacement. Industrial, agricultural, and marine wastes are assessed regarding their effects on rheology, printability, mechanical performance, interlayer bonding, and durability. The reviewed literature investigated waste incorporation levels reaching up to 50% for cement replacement, up to 70% for alkali-activated/geopolymer systems, and up to 100% for aggregate replacement, depending on the material type and application pathway. Industrial wastes, particularly fly ash, slag, silica fume, and metakaolin, represent the most mature materials and generally improve printability and long-term performance. Agricultural and marine wastes show promising sustainability potential but remain insufficiently investigated. Despite encouraging laboratory-scale results, challenges related to material variability, early-age performance, standardization, and scalability continue to limit practical implementation. The review identifies critical research gaps and outlines future directions for developing sustainable and field-ready 3DCP technologies.
Description: Data Availability Statement: Data are contained within the article.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33533
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126258
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Rabee Shamass https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-8227
ORCiD: Yen-Yu Lin https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6510-2063
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).2.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons