Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33690
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoepp, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorRupp, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Oliver R.-
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-13T09:50:04Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-13T09:50:04Z-
dc.date.issued2026-07-22-
dc.identifier.citationGoepp, T. et al. (2026) 'Cognitive function during self-paced cycling under heat stress: Performance, perceptual, and neuromuscular fatigue responses in athletes', Journal of Sports Sciences, 00(0), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2026.2703352.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0264-0414-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33690-
dc.descriptionSupplemental material: Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2026.2703352# .en_GB
dc.description.abstractHeat stress impairs both physical and cognitive function, yet its impact on simultaneous cognitive-motor dual-tasking (CMDT) remains unclear. Sixteen trained athletes completed two high-intensity CMDT sessions in hot (HOT, 40°C) or temperate (CON, 20°C) conditions. Each 21-min cycling exercise comprised 7-min at a self-paced ‘strong’ intensity followed by 14 min at a fixed-power, based on the last power selected, during which participants performed two 7-min blocks (Ex7-14, Ex14-21) of a sustained attention task (SART). Heart rate (%HRmax), rectal temperature (Trec), and perceived mental effort were monitored, while knee-extensor neuromuscular fatigue was assessed after exercise via femoral nerve stimulation during a 1-min sustained maximal contraction. Self-paced power output was lower in HOT (198 ± 49 W) than CON (223 ± 46 W, P <0.001). %HRmax rose more steeply in HOT (interaction P <0.001), whereas Trec did not differ between conditions (38.5 ± 0.4°C at Ex21). SART performance declined over time (−10 ± 7%, P = 0.006) but was consistently lower in HOT (64 ± 12%) vs. CON (74 ± 8%, P = 0.004), despite similar increases in perceived effort. The force loss during sustained contraction was greater in HOT (−71 ± 21%) vs. CON (−54 ± 19%, P = 0.024). Despite lower self-paced power, heat stress further impaired concurrent cognitive performance during CMDT and subsequent force production, indicating greater fatigue development.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–14-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor and Francis Group)en_GB
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectcognitive-motor dual-tasken_GB
dc.subjectexerciseen_GB
dc.subjecttemperatureen_GB
dc.subjectattentionen_GB
dc.subjectfemoral stimulationen_GB
dc.titleCognitive function during self-paced cycling under heat stress: Performance, perceptual, and neuromuscular fatigue responses in athletesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-07-02-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2703352-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Sports Sciencesen_GB
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-447X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-07-02-
dcterms.issued2026-07-22-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidGibson, Oliver R. [0000-0001-6777-5562]-
dc.contributor.orcidHayes, Mark [0000-0002-1507-3750]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons