Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33706| Title: | Effects of cephalexin treatment on DNA replication dynamics in Escherichia coli |
| Other Titles: | Effects of cephalexin treatment on DNA replication dynamics in <i>Escherichia coli</i> |
| Authors: | Grigoryan, Iren Krawiel, Dominika Dunbar, Emma L Peros, Stelinda McCarthy, Ronan R Rudolph, Christian J |
| Keywords: | replication run-out;DNA replication dynamics;cell division inhibitor;antibiotic-induced DNA damage |
| Issue Date: | 22-Aug-2026 |
| Publisher: | BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature) |
| Citation: | Grigoryan, I. et al. (2026) 'Effects of cephalexin treatment on DNA replication dynamics in <i>Escherichia coli</i>', BMC Microbiology, 0(ahead of print), pp. 1–45. doi: 10.1186/s12866-026-05510-w. |
| Abstract: | Background: In bacteria, DNA replication and chromosome segregation are tightly coordinated with cell division. The replication run-out method, which combines inhibition of transcription initiation by rifampicin with inhibition of cell division by cephalexin, is widely used to analyse replication dynamics by allowing ongoing replication forks to complete in the absence of new initiations. While this approach is generally robust, the physiological consequences of the individual components of the method, particularly cephalexin, are less well characterised. Results: Here, we investigated the effects of cephalexin treatment on DNA replication in Escherichia coli. Cephalexin treatment resulted in rapid filamentation and, when applied alone, led to extensive cell lysis. Concomitantly, a subpopulation of cells displayed an increase in the number of replisome-associated DnaN foci, which was accompanied by amplification of both origin- and terminus-proximal chromosomal loci. Genetic analysis demonstrated that this response was largely dependent on the replication initiator DnaA, whereas mutants impaired in replication restart pathways did not show a corresponding reduction, arguing against a major contribution from pathways such as recombination-dependent replication. Importantly, co-treatment with rifampicin largely suppressed the increase in replication activity observed following cephalexin treatment and strongly reduced cell lysis, revealing a physiological antagonism between the two drugs under these conditions. Conclusions: Our findings show that cephalexin treatment alone is not physiologically neutral with respect to DNA replication and can result in DnaA-dependent replication activity in a subset of cells. While the classical rifampicin-cephalexin replication run-out approach largely mitigates these effects, residual heterogeneity remains and may be exacerbated in sensitised genetic backgrounds. These results highlight the importance of considering antibiotic-induced physiological responses, including antagonistic drug interactions, when interpreting replication phenotypes in both single- and combination-treatment experiments. |
| Description: | Availability of data and materials:
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available via the Brunel Figshare repository: https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.31999347 The publisher is sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. |
| URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33706 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-026-05510-w |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 32.71 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License