Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33740
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGammie, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorArlandis, Salvador-
dc.contributor.authorCouri, Bruna M-
dc.contributor.authorDrinnan, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorOchoa, D Carolina-
dc.contributor.authorRantell, Angie-
dc.contributor.authorde Rijk, Mathijs-
dc.contributor.authorvan Steenbergen, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorDamaser, Margot-
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-22T18:03:02Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-22T18:03:02Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-03-
dc.identifier.citationGammie, A. et al. (2024) 'Can we use machine learning to improve the interpretation and application of urodynamic data?: ICI-RS 2023', Neurourology and Urodynamics, 43(6), pp. 1337–1343. doi: 10.1002/nau.25319.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33740-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: A “Think Tank” at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society meeting held in Bristol, United Kingdom in June 2023 considered the progress and promise of machine learning (ML) applied to urodynamic data. Methods: Examples of the use of ML applied to data from uroflowmetry, pressure flow studies and imaging were presented. The advantages and limitations of ML were considered. Recommendations made during the subsequent debate for research studies were recorded. Results: ML analysis holds great promise for the kind of data generated in urodynamic studies. To date, ML techniques have not yet achieved sufficient accuracy for routine diagnostic application. Potential approaches that can improve the use of ML were agreed and research questions were proposed. Conclusions: ML is well suited to the analysis of urodynamic data, but results to date have not achieved clinical utility. It is considered likely that further research can improve the analysis of the large, multifactorial data sets generated by urodynamic clinics, and improve to some extent data pattern recognition that is currently subject to observer error and artefactual noise.en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1337–1343-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: InCopyright-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Publisher's own licence-
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/-
dc.subjectartifical intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectpattern recognitionen_US
dc.subjecturodynamic dataen_US
dc.subjecturodynamicsen_US
dc.subject1103 Clinical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject1109 Neurosciencesen_US
dc.subjectUrology & Nephrologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshUrinary Incontinence-
dc.subject.meshUrodynamics-
dc.subject.meshMachine Learning-
dc.subject.meshUrodynamics-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshMachine Learning-
dc.subject.meshUrinary Incontinence-
dc.titleCan we use machine learning to improve the interpretation and application of urodynamic data?: ICI-RS 2023en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2023-10-22-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25319-
dc.relation.isPartOfNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
pubs.issue6-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume43-
dc.identifier.eissn1520-6777-
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-10-22-
dcterms.issued2023-11-03-
dc.date.updated2026-08-22T17:52:42Z-
dc.contributor.orcidGammie, Andrew [0000-0001-5546-357X]-
dc.contributor.orcidArlandis, Salvador [0000-0002-1224-9423]-
dc.contributor.orcidCouri, Bruna M [0000-0003-4021-6669]-
dc.contributor.orcidDrinnan, Michael [0000-0002-2181-8202]-
dc.contributor.orcidOchoa, D Carolina [/0000-0002-2374-848X]-
dc.contributor.orcidRantell, Angie [0000-0002-9123-5352]-
dc.contributor.orcidde Rijk, Mathijs [0000-0001-8625-464X]-
dc.contributor.orcidvan Steenbergen, Thomas [0000-0003-4401-3500]-
dc.contributor.orcidDamaser, Margot [0000-0003-4743-9283]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 Owner. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Gammie A, Arlandis S, Couri BM, et al. Can we use machine learning to improve the interpretation and application of urodynamic data?: ICI-RS 2023. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024; 43: 1337-1343, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25319. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited (see: https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html )..84.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.