Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33802
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Jordan W-
dc.contributor.authorBarlev, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-01T14:43:44Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-01T14:43:44Z-
dc.date.issued2026-03-19-
dc.identifier.citationMoon, J.W. and Barlev, M. (2026) 'Google-Search Data for Psychological Scientists: A Tutorial and Best Practices', Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 9(1), pp. 1–29. doi: 10.1177/25152459251409146.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2515-2459-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33802-
dc.descriptionAcknowledgments: This article does not involve human participants, personal data, or experimental procedures requiring ethical approval. All data included are publicly available, and no identifiable individual information is used.en_US
dc.description.abstractGoogle searches have been described as the most important data set on the human psyche ever assembled. Google-search data—accessible through a tool called Google Trends—can provide new insights on topics as varied as stereotypes and prejudices, political attitudes, religious identity and belief, personality, motivations, psychological well-being, mental health, and culture. Google Trends can generate highly customized data sets: Users can compare the popularity of search terms across most of the world or access longitudinal data as far back as 2004, and they can do so with high geographical and temporal granularity. Notwithstanding these opportunities, Google Trends has significant limitations. Without appropriate caution, users can easily rely on data that are not meaningful or draw mistaken conclusions. We provide a comprehensive overview and tutorial covering (a) opportunities of Google Trends for psychological scientists; (b) how Google Trends scores are calculated, how reliable they are, and why some queries might yield low-quality data; (c) instructions with accompanying R code for creating custom data sets beyond what Google Trends provides by default; (d) example analyses for studies that could be done using Google Trends data; (e) an overview of common pitfalls; and (f) recommendations for safeguarding data quality and their interpretation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe writing of this article was supported by the Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc. (funder DOI 501100011730) through Grant No. 30290 (https://doi.org/10.54224/30290). J. W. Moon also acknowledges funding from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (under the Investissement d’Avenir program, ANR-17-EURE-0010).en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–29-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-NC-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: CC BY-NC-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectbig dataen_US
dc.subjectarchival dataen_US
dc.subjectinternet search volumeen_US
dc.subjectGoogle Trendsen_US
dc.subjectlongitudinal dataen_US
dc.subjectopen dataen_US
dc.subjectopen materialsen_US
dc.titleGoogle-Search Data for Psychological Scientists: A Tutorial and Best Practicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-12-02-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251409146-
dc.relation.isPartOfAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Scienceen_US
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume9-
dc.identifier.eissn2515-2467-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-12-02-
dcterms.issued2026-03-19-
dc.date.updated2026-09-01T14:36:29Z-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidMoon, Jordan [0000-0001-5102-3585]-
dc.identifier.number25152459251409146-
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2026. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC 4.0) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).2.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons