Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33835
Title: AI-assisted auditing review of mechanical engineering drawings: a Perception–Cognition–Collaboration reference architecture and its implementation Perspectives
Authors: Chen, Xin
Cheng, Kai
Keywords: engineering drawing auditing review;AI-assisted compliance checking;P–C–C reference architecture;standards-grounded reasoning;multi-agent systems;design automation
Issue Date: 7-Aug-2026
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Chen, X. and Cheng, K. (2026) 'AI-assisted auditing review of mechanical engineering drawings: a Perception–Cognition–Collaboration reference architecture and its implementation Perspectives', International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 0(ahead of print), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/0951192x.2026.2714117.
Abstract: Mechanical drawing audits are essential to product design and manufacturing but remain labor-intensive and error-prone, particularly when checking tolerances, surface roughness, materials, treatments and assembly requirements. Although computer vision, document understanding, large language models (LLMs), knowledge representation and multi-agent systems (MAS) can support individual tasks, existing efforts remain fragmented. This paper proposes an engineering-oriented approach to AI-assisted mechanical drawing auditing and a three-layer Perception – Cognition – Collaboration (P – C – C) pre-validation reference architecture. Perception transforms carrier-specific evidence into provenance-bearing entities and relations. Cognition aligns them with a versioned Standards-and-Requirements Knowledge Graph and applies approved deterministic numerical and logical rules outside the LLM. Collaboration coordinates audit tasks, preserves conflicts, and routes critical or uncertain findings to authorized engineers. An audit of the Merge_places Computer Vision Dataset reveals limitations in schema consistency, lineage, class semantics and clause grounding. De-identified drawing regions illustrate clearance calculation, detection of a controlled tolerance mismatch, and the routing of GD&T and bill-of-materials (BOM) requests when evidence is incomplete. These bounded cases clarify interface behavior and define validation requirements for provenance, deterministic checking, interoperability, uncertainty, cybersecurity and human governance before engineering deployment. The framework integrates heterogeneous evidence, executable rules and accountable human decisions within a traceable and selectively automated audit workflow.
Description: Data availability statement: The data presented in this study are available in [Merge_places Computer Vision Dataset] at [https://universe.roboflow.com/symboldetection-4xwmm/merge_places], accessed on 18 July 2025.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33835
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2026.2714117
ISSN: 0951-192X
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.6.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons